Art at ISP
Veteran
The answer is simple. They REFUSE to fix the fare structure which is broken. They could easily improve revenues with some modest adjustments to the fares.Justair said:I do not want to continue to beat up Dave but I feel the problem lies in the revenue side of the equation.
Employee cost are down, productive is up. But they can not get a hold of the revenue steam???
Why???
America West did it, and they made a profit.
American did it in key markets and they made a profit (which disproves the excuse that it wouldn't work because our costs are so high).
Remember that the LCC's are not always the least expensive, but they create the impression that they are. It's called good marketing. I have colleagues traveling to the east coast from California next week-one from SAN the other from SNA. Both of them are on UA because they were considerably less that Jetblue!!
Stop catering to the low end of the market, or the "Priceline" flyer. They do not sustain the airline-they fly maybe once or twice a year, and they are the first ones to cause a scene when something goes wrong. Instead market to your core customer-the frequent business traveler-your Preferred customer. Most of us WILL pay a little more to stay on line but NOT $500 or more! For example, the days of the $2000 round trip transcon are gone forever. While $99 or $149 is definitely way too low, I think that a "full" fare of $299-$399 each way would be fair.
Which brings me to my next point--the product. To be honest, it's terrible. And I don't mean the employees--you all know that I think you're absolutely the best. You do an amazing job with the tools you're given. Other airlines' coach product is better than US First--I upgrade for the seat and the preboarding more than the service. Remember it's more the PERCEPTION rather than the substance. In some cases the LCC's provide a better product at an equal or lower cost. You have to give us a REASON to pay more--we expect some VALUE for our money.
On the point of perception, I saw the picture of the 767 galley on the other thread. Regardless of the fact that the missing panel was cosmetic, just imagine the PERCEPTION given to passengers who are not knowledgeable or easily impressionable. I would NEVER allow that aircraft to fly revenue in that condition.
A final note on fares, and I know I have said this before--I had been told by a member of management (very senior I might add) that if they could increase the bottom fare bucket by about $20, they could lower the top level by $300! My suggestion: DO IT ALREADY. As a loyal and frequent customer who often pays M Class or higher, I resent subsidizing Mr. and Mrs. Priceline, and I do not think it's fair to expect me to do so.
Revenue could easily be improved by simple rationalization of the fare structure. They have already cut more than they should have, and we're all suffering for it--the wonderful employees have less to work with, we have less choices in service let alone the poor product offered.
What we need is a marketing team who knows what they're doing and can promote the advantages of this wonderful airline---YOU THE EMPLOYEES, rather than spending all their energy creating spin for the negatives...
I am sorry to rant, but I am frustrated. Even though I am not an employee, I fly the line almost as much as some of you do, and I care very deeply what happens here-I feel I have a somewhat vested interest in US.
As always, my best to you all, and let's hope someone starts listening soon.