ITRADE said:
AFAIK, they do most everything.
...But AFAYK, is it their specialty? ...And, Does this answer the question about how an independent objective audit will secure the trust of Employees that their financial sacrifice wasn't squandered. ... And, Can this audit reveal that Management has in fact done their best. ...And, Is there no recourse but to extract further concessions beyond what was agreed to less than a year ago. ...And, Did the Company, exclusive of a labor coalition, select this Auditor. ...And, Is this Auditor apt to contradict Executive accounts of it's best effort given the tools it said it needed. ...And, will this auditor, being commisioned by Management share it's critique of Management with Labor Leaders?
I think I'm beating it to death but not making my point clear.
Any rational individual wouldn't choose to destroy his/her life.
Therefore the Employees need to know, for Management's part, was every opportunity taken to modify the Business Model for maximum profitability and operational efficiency within the paramenters of contract agreements. Managements words are predictable and biased on the topic and therefore untrusted by Employees.
If not, can this be a starting point in which, Management may begin to modify the Business Model for maximum profitability and operational efficiency within the parameters of contract agreements. Managements words are predictable and biased on the topic and therefore untrusted by Employees.
If not, to what extent does an objective audit, determine the extent of additional prudent sacrifice by Employees is necessary given the phased implementation of operational enhancements in a new "Transformation" Business Plan. Managements words are predictable and biased on the topic and therefore untrusted by Employees.
The point is -- The employees are begging for a reason to trust Management. But Management has lost all credibility with Labor. Therefore either the executives leave or Management vidicates themselves by selecting an unbiased Transportation Management Consulting Firm - All with the coordination and cooperation of a Labor coalition.
Management telling labor there is a problem, isn't the problem.
Labor believing Management telling labor there is a problem, is the problem.
If Employees are to just take Management's words as truth, then the Employees should have allowed Management to hire it's own consultant to validate that Major Maintenance could be outsourced according to necessity and contract agreements. -- But it was an unbiased outside source who's judgments were understood and accepted as truth by the Employees.
If Employees are to just take Management's words as truth, then Employees should have allowed Management to hire it’s own consultant to validate that F/A furloughs are a necessity and within the constraints of contract agreements. – But it was an unbiased outside source who’s judgments and worthy considerations were understood and accepted as truth by the Employees.
There are literally Hundreds of points of contract agreements such as these which have been violated by allegement and which are scheduled for review by an unbiased outside review, evaluation and conclusive judgment – Which will be understood and accepted as truth by the Employees.
Management has buried itself in a sea of Mistrust. Mistrust which has been validated for the Employees by outside unbiased opinion. So with this pending crisis, is it prudent to demand that the Employees faithfully – “Believeâ€.
Unfortunately, and unlike the cooperative Corporate Cultures of other Airlines; The precedent for success and trust has been established between Management/Labor here at USAirways. The Labor Coalition and Management must have an expeditious, mutually agreed-upon, objective, outside audit, so that necessary judgments and worthy assessments of the requirement for additional Employee concessions are understood and accepted as truth by the Employees.
If you can convince the Employee that further sacrifice is indeed necessary with no alternative for survival, and that the plotted course of the new “Transformation†Business Plan will not further squander their additional contributions, then he/she will not prudently destroy their lives for spite of Management.
Is that not Clear and Reasonable?