First of all , like management always tells us, you cant compare what other people in other industries make with what the same type of people make in this industry. The peer group for AMR executives is other airline executives, not Home Depot Executives....not a justification. Just a way of showing that, like line employees, execs and other management employees are underpaid relative to their peers.
Stock price growth is not a true indicator of company performance, stock price increases like we see at AMR are primarily driven by speculation.
Besides, unlike AMR, Home Depot has performed well as a company, they have a market cap of $81.2 billion compared to AMRs $7.1B,HDs PE was 13.6, AMR was "NA", HD had $90 Billion in sales vs AMRs $22billion, and HD had a profit of $6 billion vs AMRs $390 million loss. So when you consider that HD is profitable and has nearly four times the sales that AMR has, along with a substantial profit, and how long HD been around compared to AMR I would say that Home Depots growth has been nothing less than phenominal.I'm sure that those who bought HD stock twenty years ago or whenever they first came out did a hell of a lot better than those who bought AMR stock the same year.
So are you are claiming that a lone worker who needs to put food on the table sits on a level playing field with a multibillion dollar corporation, which is usually a collective of investors capital, that has thousands of workers doing the same job? If so thats rediculous, and you are a fool.So, you got what you negotiated, and the people hired before you got what they negotiated. It doesn't get any fairer than that.
Or are you trying to say that unfair is as fair as it gets?
The fact is it does get fairer than that, workers combine their labor levergage through unions just as investors combine their capital leverage through corporations and then negotiate a price, and thats as fair as it gets.