Competition in the Skies: Is Delta the Problem, or the Solution?

I know a song that gets on everybody's nerves,
Everybody's nerves, everybody's nerves,
I know a song that gets on everybody's nerves,
and this is how it goes...

I know a song that gets on everybody's nerves,
Everybody's nerves, everybody's nerves,
I know a song that gets on everybody's nerves,
and this is how it goes....

I know a song that gets on everybody's nerves,
Everybody's nerves, everybody's nerves,
I know a song that gets on everybody's nerves,
and this is how it goes.....
 
E has been trying to have the show to himself for about 10 years and in the absence of actually providing any real counter to what those who know the industry actually say, he just resorts to personal attacks
 
WorldTraveler said:
E has been trying to have the show to himself for about 10 years and in the absence of actually providing any real counter to what those who know the industry actually say, he just resorts to personal attacks
I've been trying to have the show to myself? Really? Weak, sir. Really weak.

I'm more than happy to share the stage with Kev, Glenn, FWAAA, AMFADave, Mach85ER, swaamt and probably another dozen or so regulars who are on the opposite side from me on any given topic.

I doubt anyone's interested in shutting you down when you actually behave as a member of the community.

It's when you don't behave that you get called out for it, e.g. when you start shouting people down, using the ultra-condescending tone, and/or exhibiting your need to dominate just about any discussion you enter (e.g. responding to *every* post which disagrees with you).

This isn't a sermon or a lecture. At some point, you have to let other people at the table talk.
 
resorting to personal attacks... you mean like when you slam a poster for using grammar etc   last I checked  E has not done that  
 
Wow.  So WT's response about E is that he is "trying to have the show to himself"!!  Speaks volumes WT.  It merely means you, sir, are trying to have the show yourself and E is stepping on your ground, making waves, or preventing YOU from having the show.  Get over yourself, get over the Delta issues you have, and get a clue.  BTW E doesn't sling personal attacks.  You have and do, and yes one of your favs is the spelling and grammar.  WT you have been falling apart ever since the downfall of Delta over the LF gates as well as the other slots only being granted to LCC's.
You are the one trying to have the show to yourself, NOBODY else out here cares for it but YOU, period.  If anyone post a positive thing for their airline you drum up some kind of BS to try and knock their post down because it was in another airlines favor other than Delta's. 
BTW;  Keep up the great campaign you are doing for the IAM trying to get in at Delta, the more you speak, preach and push for the IAM the more people fade away from thinking about voting for the IAM.  You for the IAM is just like OS, Realityck and others pushing for the teamsters at other airlines.   The more you promote and campaign for the IAM, the more people move away from the IAM, and just look at the disastrous workings of the IAM over at US with their mechanics.
 Sorry all got off topic there, my rant is over, pls carry on...
 
glad to know I have successfully stirred the pot one more time.
 
You do realize the irony of accusing me of insulting someone when that is exactly what E did before and Kev regularly throws his 2 1/2 cents in to do the same thing.  
 
I don't really care who speaks... but when they try to defend stuff like E has about AA on a repeated basis and now joins with most of the rest of the participants in this discussion to make it personal, you prove that you indeed the mental widgets that are focused solely on anything you can come up with to say against DL, which really equates to an attempt to discredit me.
 
I am sitting right now next to PMNW employees who say "there is no need for a union... there are always people who can't adapt to the new reality but they are the minority."
 
I couldn't have asked for anything better.  
 
glad to know I have successfully stirred the pot one more time.
 
You do realize the irony of accusing me of insulting someone when that is exactly what E did before and Kev regularly throws his 2 1/2 cents in to do the same thing.  
 
I don't really care who speaks... but when they try to defend stuff like E has about AA on a repeated basis and now joins with most of the rest of the participants in this discussion to make it personal, you prove that you indeed the mental widgets that are focused solely on anything you can come up with to say against DL, which really equates to an attempt to discredit me.
 
I am sitting right now next to PMNW employees who say "there is no need for a union... there are always people who can't adapt to the new reality but they are the minority."
 
I couldn't have asked for anything better.  
 
There you go again repeat-repeat-repeat.  And making no cense what-so-ever.  Pls keep posting and promoting, carry on,  LOL...
 
WorldTraveler said:
I am sitting right now next to PMNW employees who say "there is no need for a union... there are always people who can't adapt to the new reality but they are the minority."
 
I couldn't have asked for anything better.  
 
Spectator?
:p
 
swamt said:
There you go again repeat-repeat-repeat.  And making no cense what-so-ever.  Pls keep posting and promoting, carry on,  LOL...
 
kind of like the IAM thing, the denial of that WN is dumping half of FL's network after spending $2B to go chase some protected markets... yes, same thing.
 
Kev3188 said:
^Speaks volumes^
 
and yet it works
 
FrugalFlyerv2.0 said:
 
Spectator?
:p
 
he doesn't get around WT does.
 
5 cities, 3 continents, the world is changing and the vast majority of people on here are simply trying to defend an indefensible position
 

Latest posts

Back
Top