Charlie_Tuna
Veteran
- Sep 29, 2005
- 661
- 0
It is funny how everyday USA320 posted the "Code-a-Phone" update for all to see and now it is so suddenly quiet since May 20....
ALPA Code-a-Phone...
ALPA Code-a-Phone...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There hasn't been a new one since then.
Jim
My number is WELL north of 100. So I have nothing to #### about. Except that it's not about me. It's about a pilot group that is not going to take any more crap. From ALPA, an arbitrator who doesn't follow policy, or the company. Or a bunch of pilots who think they just won a lottery.
pilot
pilot
pilot said:None of us feel as if we won the lottery. Out of all the carriers to buy, our CEO had to throw a deal together with USAir; enough said. This is not to inflame, but simply a personal opinion shared by many from the west. Now that we are together, the pilots at America West would like to move forward with our friends in the east. We have our relative seniority somewhat preserved, have suffered through a long period of no growth and our number one pilot is now 518 on the seniority list. If you believe our situation at America West is comparable to winning the lottery could you please share your definition of us losing.
"We gambled and we lost."
Again. Going to arbitration is a given under current policy. Agreeing to do so means you are agreeing to an arbitration that meets the standards of ALPA merger policy. This process is not "Vegas."
If pilots had been "leap frogged" over other pilots in the same airline, do you think ALPA would have let it stand? Nope.
Remember, the reason ALPA National has never overturned an award is they have never been asked to do so.
This award falls so far out of the range of ALPA Merger policy that it is disgraceful. In the area of "windfalls" it fails so badly one has to question the true intent of the person that wrote it.
If ALPA did not have the final say, then why is the award not handed directly to the company for implementation?
The process did not fail here, nor did any pilot group or lawyer. The only failure here is by the man that made the actual decision...one that will probably tear this airline and union apart.
This award will never be fully implemented on this property as currently written. That I know.
Greeter.
"We gambled and we lost."
This award falls so far out of the range of ALPA Merger policy that it is disgraceful. In the area of "windfalls" it fails so badly one has to question the true intent of the person that wrote it.
If ALPA did not have the final say, then why is the award not handed directly to the company for implementation?
The process did not fail here, nor did any pilot group or lawyer. The only failure here is by the man that made the actual decision...one that will probably tear this airline and union apart.
This award will never be fully implemented on this property as currently written. That I know.
Greeter.
No OAL pilots agree that the Nic award is, as you say, "so far out of the range of ALPA merger policy." I just had a DAL pilot on the jumpseat; a former LEC chair and long time member of the system board of adjustment. I posed this actual question to him and his response was simply, "No." He cited the fact that the widebodies were fenced and that the East further received the top 500 seniority numbers as being more than sufficient to protect the expectations of East pilots. Ratioing the remainder of the list is perfectly withing merger policy guidelines. His comments were nearly identical to those of a UAL pilot on the jumpseat last week; a one-time LEC vice-chair in LAX. Sure, these are only two opinions, but I have yet to hear from a single OAL pilot say anything other than the East has nothing to complain about. ALPA is not going to touch something that isn't broken.
Are you just "that" far out of touch.. Do you really think someone asking you for a ride home is going to "disagree" with you.. And further more Asking a UAL or DAL pilot if they "think" what happened to USAir pilot was "fair" is like asking a culver city crypt and a blood if they think what happened to the other gang member is fair.. Come on --- THE UAL AND DAL pilots would do ANYTHING to despise and see the USAir pilots in misery b/c of previous merger attempts and "they" were afraid of what?? Losing their seniority to USAir guys.. You folks seriously need some help.. and I hope you can't sleep at night, b/c everyone knows what happened is wrong and you are supporting something that you know you shouldn't - which will only come around to bite you.. REMEMBER this industry is far from stable...No OAL pilots agree that the Nic award is, as you say, "so far out of the range of ALPA merger policy." I just had a DAL pilot on the jumpseat; a former LEC chair and long time member of the system board of adjustment. I posed this actual question to him and his response was simply, "No." He cited the fact that the widebodies were fenced and that the East further received the top 500 seniority numbers as being more than sufficient to protect the expectations of East pilots. Ratioing the remainder of the list is perfectly withing merger policy guidelines. His comments were nearly identical to those of a UAL pilot on the jumpseat last week; a one-time LEC vice-chair in LAX. Sure, these are only two opinions, but I have yet to hear from a single OAL pilot say anything other than the East has nothing to complain about. ALPA is not going to touch something that isn't broken.
...I just had a DAL pilot on the jumpseat....
Have all the other OAL pilots you have talked to read the ruling and looked at the lists? I doubt they know much about it and they are thinking "Well, he took care of the widebody flying, that should cover me in a merger". I haven't had any OAL pilots on the jumpseat since this came out, but I'd be surprised if they would do anything but agree with us, while asking for a ride.
You should listen to what the OAL pilots are saying in the East cockpits.No OAL pilots agree that the Nic award is, as you say, "so far out of the range of ALPA merger policy." I just had a DAL pilot on the jumpseat; a former LEC chair and long time member of the system board of adjustment. I posed this actual question to him and his response was simply, "No." He cited the fact that the widebodies were fenced and that the East further received the top 500 seniority numbers as being more than sufficient to protect the expectations of East pilots. Ratioing the remainder of the list is perfectly withing merger policy guidelines. His comments were nearly identical to those of a UAL pilot on the jumpseat last week; a one-time LEC vice-chair in LAX. Sure, these are only two opinions, but I have yet to hear from a single OAL pilot say anything other than the East has nothing to complain about. ALPA is not going to touch something that isn't broken.