Clipped Workers Of Airlines Warn,

Checking it Out

Veteran
Apr 3, 2003
1,702
0
Clipped workers of airlines warn: Fight cutbacks at own risk

By Micheline Maynard
The New York Times





New York - Leonard Robinson, who put in 30 years as a mechanic for Pan American World Airways, has a message for his counterparts at United, US Airways, Delta and other struggling airlines pressing their workers for concessions: Do not wait until it is too late.
"Negotiate, just negotiate," Robinson said.

Pan Am had more than 26,000 workers in its last full year of operation in 1990. All those jobs were lost when the carrier shut down Dec. 1, 1991.

"They should give up something" if it will save their jobs, said Robinson, 74, of Brooklyn.

But David Garriga, who was laid off in 2001, after Trans World Airlines went bankrupt and was absorbed by American, said he did not regret fighting the constant rounds of concessions that TWA management sought. Even though he has not worked since, he said the unions had no other choice.


"It got to the point where we said, 'We're not going to give back and take away any more,"' said Garriga, 53, of Valley Stream, N.Y.

Therein lies the problem that union workers at the major airlines face, none more so than at US Airways, which filed for bankruptcy protection for a second time Sept. 12, after its employees refused to grant $800 million in wage and benefit cuts, the third round of cuts sought by the company.

The struggles of US Airways, along with those of United Airlines, which has been in bankruptcy since December 2002, and Delta Air Lines, which is threatening to seek court protection, leave more than 100,000 airline workers facing uncertainty about their futures. If all three companies fail, which analysts say is not likely, that would wipe out more jobs than the 110,000 lost after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

If the union workers give in, as Robinson counseled, they still might see their jobs vanish anyway, but once that happened, they might not find other jobs, like Garriga has not, and surely never the kinds of jobs they once held, for the industry has fundamentally changed.

The recent bankruptcies at US Airways and United demonstrate that companies can face financial distress even when workers cooperate, strengthening the resolve of today's labor groups to resist further cuts.

Even so, the previous generation's hard-line stance is understandable because airline jobs were once considered tickets to an enviable lifestyle.

"People used to say, 'You'll never be a millionaire, but you'll live like one,"' said Peter Cappelli, a management professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

But those days are gone, as are the health care benefits and the company stock that Mitchell Jensen, a 72-year-old former ramp worker for Pan Am, received in lieu of raises during the airline's final 11 years.

All that Jensen has left is a pension of $832.78 a month, administered by the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., which took over the airline's retirement plan when Pan Am went under.

Bobby Hall, who is in his mid- 50s and spent 33 years repairing planes for Trans World Airlines, was not as lucky. He lost his job on Oct. 6, 2001, when American, which assumed TWA's assets in bankruptcy, laid off thousands of workers. He has not found work since.

"The airline field is basically dead right now," said Hall, who lives in Oceanside, N.Y.

Although Garriga, the former TWA mechanic, supported taking a hard-line stance with management, that strategy would not be in the best interests of the workers at US Airways, Delta and other airlines, said Nick Lacetera, 53, the former president of the Pan Am credit union, who is now in charge of the financial institution that acquired its assets.

"The reality is that they are going to have to bite the bullet and do what is necessary to survive," Lacetera said.

"A half of a loaf is better than none."
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #2
Is this going to be the norm or are we going to stop allowing the dramatic changes to continue?

The unions are only as good as the members, With record low involvement at several elections lately at NWA, SWA, and other Amfa represented Airlines. Do we allow this to happen to us?

At American their has been a change at Two of the unions and the third the President has retired. The unions held record turnouts to vote on change. At AFW and Tulsa the locals have replaced their leaders for more aggressive ones. I believe the overall change may be good and shows how aggressive the membership is. It also shows they believe in the Unions themselves and are willing to make the current ones work.
 
Checking it Out said:
Is this going to be the norm or are we going to stop allowing the dramatic changes to continue?

The unions are only as good as the members, With record low involvement at several elections lately at NWA, SWA, and other Amfa represented Airlines. Do we allow this to happen to us?

At American their has been a change at Two of the unions and the third the President has retired. The unions held record turnouts to vote on change. At AFW and Tulsa the locals have replaced their leaders for more aggressive ones. I believe the overall change may be good and shows how aggressive the membership is. It also shows they believe in the Unions themselves and are willing to make the current ones work.
[post="182570"][/post]​


Yes but how do we replace Little, Yingst and Gless? The fact is the members brought the change about at the other two unions. Our contract is under the control of the International and we can not force them to change from within because we can not vote them out. Would your Local have been better served if your members could only elect shop stewards who can be removed by the President, then let the Stewards, even the ones from other locals and industries vote on who is on your E-board? Thats the way the Internatiuonal is set up. In the TWU the members can not change their leaders, all they can do is pick who will represent them to the International, if the International disapproves of whom they select, they simply remove them.

The other two work groups have all changed unions at one time or another because they wanted more control, the Pilots left ALPA and the Flight Attendants left the TWU. Its our turn now-AMFA.

Lets not forget that the TWU ushered in the 11 years of Concessions at Pan Am. The reporter left out the example of Eastern. The EAL mechanics fought back sooner, got to their next jobs earlier and will have enjoyed higher earnings longer than their Pan Am counterparts who propped up their crippled airline till the big wigs could steal no more. That goes for both the corporate and the union.

The TWU has sold us out. They accept their $3.1 million a year into their pockets and in return gave the company $660 million out of ours. And thats only the latest transaction. They have been selling us out for years. Their International officers accept illegal payments from the company and they hide this information both from the members and the government.

It is the TWUs structure that makes this so easy for them. A structure that many have tried, without success, to change from within. In the past those who have sought change have been terminated or removed. While they talk about change the fact is that change is not possible with these guys, we have to leave. All we need to do is look at some of the literature the TWU gave to the AA flight attendants over 25 years ago. They promised them change, they never delivered. Instead the Flight Attendants left and never looked back.

Keep spinning your propaganda CIO, the only change that you seek is a new poosition within the union that will remove from the misery of being a TWU member. After all we know that the TWU International takes care of their own with salaries benifits and other perks that they would never dream of getting for their members.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top