Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, I've said before, that I think the company needs to take the LGA/DCA/-BUF/RDU/GSO/ROC/etc stuff back from Express, do it with less frequencies (does BUF-LGA and RDU-LGA really need 9 flights/day? Can they do it on 6 or 7? I think so, especially if you use larger aircraft, so that you offer the same number of seats/day). Then use the "excess" slots to start new point-to-point service to points not currently served nonstop by US Airways... I think major midwest biz markets and Florida should be targets, for reasons I have outlined before (not trying to restart the LGA-Florida nonstop debate).Light Years said:Anyone have any predictions of point to point routes? As far as DCA LGA BOS, will they just upgrade the routes we gave to Express back to mainline? Other than the three focus cities, what else will there be? I mean how many BUF-RDU type stuff can you really do?
25% seems steep.
Assuming for a moment that additional gates don't need to be secured outside of the hubs, this isn't necessarily a bad thing. When you're looking at a hub, you need lots of the following:BoeingBoy said:On another note, if only 25% of the [mainline] flights are in/out of the hubs there's going to be a lot of expensive gates not needed but still under lease.
In 2003, 252 city pairs had sufficient traffic to support three mainline flights per day (defined as having at least 135,000 pax/yr). Of those, 83 neither began nor ended at a legacy hub. Many were Hawaiian interisland, Pacific coast, or WN-"owned" routes. However, here are some that are in US's territory, hubless, and not WN-"owned," in decreasing order of passenger traffic:Light Years said:Anyone have any predictions of point to point routes?
My guess would be costs. It costs about $1.50 for each pax out of CLT versus something like $9.00 per pax out of PIT. Multiply that by the number of pax and that's a lot of cabbage.shaka said:I can understand more direct flights into Philly, but why CLT?
Their O&D is worse than Pittsburgh.
Thanks