Bruce Lakefield Leter

hulagirl said:
Regarding the last question: I will bet you. Notwithstanding any further terrorist activity, I will bet you that employee pay concessions are over.
[post="305633"][/post]​


Including layoffs?

You are on!

Stakes?

Steaks? :up:
 
PineyBob said:
Has a judge ruled that the transaction was illegal?

Seems like the whole thing hinges on whether it was an "Asset Sale" or a sale of the entire division. Legally it makes a huge difference. To those displaced it still sucks.

BTW Light Years nice to see you posting, I hadn't seen you for a while.
[post="305749"][/post]​

Thanks Bob! I still lurk, can't kick the addiction...

The 3 RP 170s that are flying are "illegal" in that they violate several US Airways labor contracts.

The arbitrator will rule on whether or not it's an "asset sale" or "change of control", hopefully soon. The first "MAA" employees get furloughed (re-furloughed) on the 15th. :(
 
Zeus said:
Jim,

I have never stated what position that I hold within the company. I might be a front line employee or maybe not. You clearly don't understand the sacrifices that each executive has contributed to the company. Don't judge a person unless you have walked a mile in their shoes. You don't even know the $$ for the bonus monies. It is not a very large amount.
[post="305864"][/post]​

Zeus, we all know who you are. Let's face it, while the rest of us gave, you guys took (stole). Very few of you in the executive ranks are worth a retention bonus. If you were so great, how come you didn't get a job in Tempe? Time to go back and work for the politicos or at least call your buddy at that party cruise line in Florida...he's looking for a few pr people.
 
hulagirl said:
Regarding the last question: I will bet you. Notwithstanding any further terrorist activity, I will bet you that employee pay concessions are over.
[post="305633"][/post]​

Maybe. Of course when there is only a couple hundred employees left it won't be much money anyway. I see lay-offs coming and a huge increase in out-sourcing of all departments. It's the LCC way. :shock: The End
 
PineyBob said:
Well it appears as it the "TODerator" was uncomfortable with my reference. I gave AN EXAMPLE of a US Airways Executive. As I have chastised for revealing names I would like a clarification as to why it's OK for USA320 to drop names all over the place but now I'm fordidden to mention titles, even when used ONLY as examples.

Could it be that US is exerting undue influence? They did with Chris Elliot at USA Today why not US Aviation??
[post="306289"][/post]​

Something about "outings." Though, short of putting a picture of a bald guy whose name rhymes with 'limes' on this forum, I don't see what the big damn deal is. :p
 
EyeInTheSky said:
Something about "outings." Though, short of putting a picture of a bald guy whose name rhymes with 'limes' on this forum, I don't see what the big damn deal is. :p
[post="306306"][/post]​
uh..... I have one of those and he is wearing lime green lipstick. I would post it....but I don't like corn :D
 

Latest posts

Back
Top