BoeingBoy
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2003
- Messages
- 16,512
- Reaction score
- 5,865
No problem.
If you're interested, in the 1st quarter the -170 was (IIRC) the 2nd highest cost per flight hour plane we had. When you figure it on an ASM basis, it was by far the highest cost plane. But as I said, those figures are skewed so have no real meaning other than what is obvious - it's expensive getting an operation up and running.
The second quarter numbers will be somewhat skewed as well, just not as much. Such things as bringing on the crewmembers and training them so they'll be ready when the planes come on line means some expenses occur before the ASM's are produced. By the end of the year (if we're still around), the skewing will be minimized as MAA gets bigger and the "up front" expenses of each additional airplane get spread over more ASM's.
Jim
If you're interested, in the 1st quarter the -170 was (IIRC) the 2nd highest cost per flight hour plane we had. When you figure it on an ASM basis, it was by far the highest cost plane. But as I said, those figures are skewed so have no real meaning other than what is obvious - it's expensive getting an operation up and running.
The second quarter numbers will be somewhat skewed as well, just not as much. Such things as bringing on the crewmembers and training them so they'll be ready when the planes come on line means some expenses occur before the ASM's are produced. By the end of the year (if we're still around), the skewing will be minimized as MAA gets bigger and the "up front" expenses of each additional airplane get spread over more ASM's.
Jim