amt openings mco not showing up any more

[john john]

US has flown the A330 to PHX who flew it?

And the A330 has flown CLT-PHX flights, has nothing to do with who can fly the plane.

Are you that Simple minded

So American West pilots can and do fly the A330 ???

Using your thinking that would mean that's American West pilots can and do fly the A330

 

[700UW]

Are you that uninformed?

Where a plane flies has nothing to do if pilots are based there.....

Does US have A330 pilots based in LHR, FRA, FCO, CDG, SJU, CUN, SXM, MAD.....?

But yet the A330 flies to those airports and many more.

Who is American West?

 

[john john]

Who is American West?

Are you that Imperceptive
The Employee group of pilots haven’t merge there pilots seniority list yet with American airlines so they can fly the A330

 

[john john]

Are you that uninformed?

Where a plane flies has nothing to do if pilots are based there.....

Does US have A330 pilots based in LHR, FRA, FCO, CDG, SJU, CUN, SXM, MAD.....?

Were do those destination originate from ?

 

[700UW]

Who is going to fly the PMUS A330 from ORD-DUB?

Survey says PMUS crew from PHL or CLT..

Learn what cross fleeting is, it has been going on for over a year now.

 

[conehead777]

Are you that obtuse?
US has flown the A330 to PHX who flew it?
It's apparent you don't know how flight ops work.
The A330 pilots bases are only CLT and PHL.
Using your thinking that would mean that's the only city pairs they would use the plane s for.

deleated

 

[DallasConehead]

Are you that obtuse?

US has flown the A330 to PHX who flew it?

It's apparent you don't know how flight ops work.

The A330 pilots bases are only CLT and PHL.

Using your thinking that would mean that's the only city pairs they would use the plane s for.

Deleted

 

[Bob Owens]

Yet another big check that DFW isn't getting, their 5 hangars must be full. Just proves that you can only poke your finger in the company's eye for so long before the company says F this and F you. 

Hmm, how much has head count been reduced at DFW as a result?
 
You seem to be implying that DFW is being punished. Yep punished like MCI, STL and AFW, oh but wait all those places delivered best performance in the system but the company reduced or closed them anyway. So jump through hoops or poke them in the eye,  seems that the company says FU either way. 
 
Go ahead and claim "Those were operational decisions due to routing" Newsflash, its always "operational" but if management can blame their decision to move work due to performance, and some are stupid enough to believe it, they will. The fact is the company is always moving work around, station performance is never factored in, the expectation is that its a constant.  

 

[conehead777]

Hmm, how much has head count been reduced at DFW as a result?
 
You seem to be implying that DFW is being punished. Yep punished like MCI, STL and AFW, oh but wait all those places delivered best performance in the system but the company reduced or closed them anyway. So jump through hoops or poke them in the eye,  seems that the company says FU either way. 
 
Go ahead and claim "Those were operational decisions due to routing" Newsflash, its always "operational" but if management can blame their decision to move work due to performance, and some are stupid enough to believe it, they will. The fact is the company is always moving work around, station performance is never factored in, the expectation is that its a constant.

welcome back bob

 

[DallasConehead]

Hmm, how much has head count been reduced at DFW as a result?
 
You seem to be implying that DFW is being punished. Yep punished like MCI, STL and AFW, oh but wait all those places delivered best performance in the system but the company reduced or closed them anyway. So jump through hoops or poke them in the eye,  seems that the company says FU either way. 
 
Go ahead and claim "Those were operational decisions due to routing" Newsflash, its always "operational" but if management can blame their decision to move work due to performance, and some are stupid enough to believe it, they will. The fact is the company is always moving work around, station performance is never factored in, the expectation is that its a constant.  

 
Interesting points Bob, and welcome back,  your comments lead me to wonder why someone like Sangrecko would hold a meeting in the break room and tell us that if we didn't improve performance on 78s, we would lose the work.

 

[Kev3188]

To who? A vendor or a different station?

 

[DallasConehead]

Move the work to another station.

That was the context of Bob's comments wasn't it?

 

[bigjets]

So the A330 will/HAS been flowed with Ex American West pilots and Ex American West pilots in PHX will be seeing the A330 soon in PHX
OK I tell them you said so

 
 
Once again, 700 is right about this. LAA flt crews will be flying PHI-ZHR and LUS flight crews will be flying ORD-DUB. Just because a plane leaves a HUB station doesn't mean the flight crew is based there. 

 

[Vortilon]

Hmm, how much has head count been reduced at DFW as a result?
 
You seem to be implying that DFW is being punished. Yep punished like MCI, STL and AFW, oh but wait all those places delivered best performance in the system but the company reduced or closed them anyway. So jump through hoops or poke them in the eye,  seems that the company says FU either way. 
 
Go ahead and claim "Those were operational decisions due to routing" Newsflash, its always "operational" but if management can blame their decision to move work due to performance, and some are stupid enough to believe it, they will. The fact is the company is always moving work around, station performance is never factored in, the expectation is that its a constant.  

 
Nailed it!

 

[bigjets]

Hmm, how much has head count been reduced at DFW as a result?
 
You seem to be implying that DFW is being punished. Yep punished like MCI, STL and AFW, oh but wait all those places delivered best performance in the system but the company reduced or closed them anyway. So jump through hoops or poke them in the eye,  seems that the company says FU either way. 
 
Go ahead and claim "Those were operational decisions due to routing" Newsflash, its always "operational" but if management can blame their decision to move work due to performance, and some are stupid enough to believe it, they will. The fact is the company is always moving work around, station performance is never factored in, the expectation is that its a constant.  

 
 
You're explanation shows why we get nothing as a union, lets vote down the 2010 TA they HAVE to give us more. We have lost over $60k in cash alone etc.... (no reason to beet a dead horse).
 
You are trying to say that the company is pulling the work out of DFW is nothing more then flight schedule adjustments! AA's biggest HUB where EVERY type of AA aircraft fly's in and out of. Where AA has 16 hangar bays! Where AA is building their parts wear house! AA is moving the work from there! Because of the flight schedule! WOW.....Take a look at a 777 logbook, GRU is doing an aweful amount of work on our planes. AA WILL get the work done, one way or the other. If you don't believe me, ask a MCT controller, look at how many planes land at DFW and then go straight to DWH, because AA wants the plane repaired in a reasonable amount of time. The only thing the DFW mechs are doing is making sure that Texans won't be getting a transfer to DFW anytime soon. 
 
If the 787 work can't get done in DFW it WILL be moved. 
 
Like I said you don't have to listen to me, ask tech service. The guys smart enough to vote in their 2010 TA, but you guys go ahead and listen to the guys that cost us a LOT of money. Unfortunately I will be proven right again.