s80 wrenchhead
Member
- Apr 13, 2004
- 23
- 3
I agree, it is way past time for a change at this once great co..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
What needs to go are the MD80's... AA may actually be better off grounding a few extra MD80's to reduce the impact of crews having to go back to the schoolhouse for training on the 738....
Slightly higher pay on the 73's, but so little it'll hardly be a blip. Equal to increasing fuel burn by about 20-25 lbs of fuel per hour - enough to do little more than start the apu at current fuel prices.
Let's not forget that the 80's are either paid for or have low lease payments. The higher financing costs of the new aircraft have to be figured in the picture.
CO? They had very few international premium seats, so they had a lot less to lose when demand for those seats dried up in late 2008. No surprise that CO hasn't suffered losses as large as AA or UA.
Are you saying that if we reduce premium seats we could "lose less?" Funny, the management that you love to make excuses for is increasing the number of premium seats. On the 757, they are taking away one of the F/C closets to add 2 more seats. Of course, we, the flight attendants, will still be expected to find a place for additional F/C coats with less closet space than ever.