WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #16
Since the new neighbors spent $100M on a new connector bridge to their other terminal, I doubt if there is any chance they will be leaving - or could be forced to leave.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The chances are very high that AA/US will not be able to increase the number of gates they have via the merger; there are already very few gates at CLT that US does not control so the number of gates AA controls -regardless of where they are located - might be lost in order to allow additional gates for new carriers.
AA and UA could very well choose to cooperate to help each other out in various cities, although there will be a cost; split operations are expensive and bad for customer service. In some cities such as ATL, the T gates which AA and UA both use are more desirable than where CO and US are/were located on D.
Consolidation may help improve some aspects of the way the industry operates but a lot of details such as co-location of gates and fleet harmonization for merger partners that weren't even envisioned decades ago is a lot hard to accomplish.
Since the new neighbors spent $100M on a new connector bridge to their other terminal, I doubt if there is any chance they will be leaving - or could be forced to leave.
It is easy to figure out what gates Parker will choose to keep or trade for. Based on past performance, just find the gates that are the farthest from the main terminal...that will be our gates.
Greeter
I wonder how you could move airlines around at LGA to consolidate - for example - can United move to US Airways gates and US move to United Gates. UA is split. Also for example, AA runs RJ's to CLT which can stop.
Since all of the gate allocations have been determined here, isn't it a shame that no one on this forum will be consulted?
Bless your heart