Wretched Wrench said:The farther behind one gets in meeting financial obligations, the more difficult it is to catch up. I fear that AA would use the money for other things, and would not be able or willing to fund the retirement plans for the rank and file.
I guess it boils down to trust and fear.
BTW, I can't remember, has AA taken a position on the Bush administration's plan to increase the PBGC funding from $19 to $30 per year per employee? Or the proposal to require higher contributions from companies that are more underfunded?
[post="278496"][/post]
Excellent points. And if rising interest rates had nothing to do with helping to eliminate the "underfunding" then I would agree 100%. And to be fair, interest rates might not rise. But nearly everyone expects them to, and the fed has tried to raise them over the past year or so by raising the fed funds rate several times.
And the numbers don't show that AA is "falling farther behind" in its pension funding. In fact, the opposite is true - it is catching up. It is now better funded than any other airline DB plan at over 80%.
If AA had access to vast amounts of borrowed money at low rates, then AA could do what GM did last year or the year before when it issued $15 billion of new debt and contributed the $15 billion directly to its DB plans. If AA had the money lying around (or had lots of lenders willing to lend to it at low rates) then I'm guessing that AA wouldn't be trying to stretch out the catch-up timetable.
Don't know the answers to your last paragraph.