EricLv2Fish
Veteran
- Aug 25, 2005
- 1,171
- 5
Hey all,
I listened to 'Doogie's' Web cast and quite frankly -- ALPA, AFA, IAM are in for one hell of a fight. In a nutshell, there is no "need" or "hurry" to get these contracts integrated. One analyst boldly stated since what's going is "so successful" why merge, why not "operate the companies separately?" 'Doogie' went on to say they can do that, but it would be "better" to have work groups under one contract -- "It's a better way to run an airline," says 'Doogie.' Remember those words folks, "a better way to run an airline." I have a feeling the definition will change to suit management's needs. Let the company rake in big profits for years. Don't offer cost of living increases and fair pay? You'll have a mutiny on your hands and that's no path to "a better way to run an airline." 'Doogie' better brush up on some PSY 101 classes because human nature will rear it's ugly head when it feels it is being taken advantage of.
Eye
Sounds like posturing to me. A slow approach is safe. Profit sharing is also safe from the company's point of view. Keep costs inline when times are good and rewards employee performance. During tough financial times helps stop the bleeding as opposed pay increases made permanent under contract. Perhaps it's time realize the Airline industry is extremely unstable and Airlines need to have some flexibilty to recover from hard financial times. Profit sharing is one such mechanism. I can understand why Unions generally oppose profit sharing. After all one bird in the hand is better than two in the bush. Be interesting to see how this all pans out.