What does TWA have to do with US as in all the pilots of the former US Airways. Apples and Oranges You are completely clueless.
End_of_story
Cheats,
The TWA pilots action could put the LAA LUS arbitration on hold indefinitely. I'd say it has a lot to do, see excerpt from the law suit below.
PHX currently is over staffed with twice as many pilots as is needed for the number of main flights. Expect attrition to no longer be replaced as the island know as Phoenix shrinks over the next five years. Stagnation nation, aka phx!
Enjoy!
[SIZE=13pt]The Krakowski cases challenge the eliminated job protections [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]and the [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]seniority [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]rights of [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]the [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]850 former [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]TWA pilots [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]currently [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]flying for [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]American, and the hundreds [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]of [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]others [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]with [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]recall [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]rights. [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]The cases were [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]filed long [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]before American completed [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]its [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]merger [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]with US Airways [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]in [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]December 2013, and [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]not with [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]any [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]view to [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]interfere [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]with [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]an [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]unknown potential future American/US [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]Airways [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]seniority [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]integration. The [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]KrakowsW [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]litigation, [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]however, [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]will [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]not [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]be resolved [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]prior to [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]commencement [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]of [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]the [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]arbitration [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]in [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]June. Absent a stay, the [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]arbitration [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]will [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]necessarily determine [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]rights [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]that are the [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]subject [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]of [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]the [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]litigation. [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]The arbitration should thus be stayed pending [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]the resolution [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]of [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]the Krakowski [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]litigation. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=12pt]A [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]“district [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]court [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]has the inherent [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]ability to [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]protect [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]its own jurisdiction [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]over the [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]dispute pending before [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]it.” [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]Bank of America, [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]N.A. [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]v. [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]UMB [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]Financial Services, [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]Inc., [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]618 [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]F.3d 906, [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]914 [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt](8th [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]Cir. [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]2010). Concurrent [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]with [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]that inherent power, the [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]All [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]Writs Act [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]expressly gives federal courts the power [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]to [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]“issue [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]all writs [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]necessary [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]or [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]appropriate [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]in [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]aid of [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]their respective jurisdictions and agreeable [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]to [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]the [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]usages and principles [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]of law.” [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]28 [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]U.S.C. [/SIZE][SIZE=14pt]§ [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]1651(a). [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]That power includes staying arbikations. See [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]In [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]m American Express Financial Advisors Securities [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]Litigation, [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]672 [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]F.3d [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]113, 141, [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]n.20 [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt](2d Cir. [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]2011 [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt])rSome [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]courts have [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]explicitly relied [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]upon the [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]All [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]Writs Act [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]in [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]enjoining [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]arbitrations [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]in [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]similar circumstances [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt]to [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]those before us [/SIZE][SIZE=11pt]in [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]this [/SIZE][SIZE=14pt]appear [/SIZE][SIZE=12pt][citing [/SIZE][SIZE=13pt]cases]).[/SIZE]
Skier