Zaevion William Dobson killed shielding girls from gunfire

EastUS1 said:
 
It's sad indeed that you even care about such a fine youngster's "color" or "race". All I see is a courageous young person we all are much poorer for the loss of.
 
".regardless of how brave the act" Defined that young Man's final and finest moments. Don't you even DARE to trivialize him/his life for some BS political/social "agenda". NOTHING gives anyone that right.
 
It would take a "liberal" to at all seek to use this young Man's sacrifice of his very life to somehow be perverted for "politically correct" BS. WTF difference does it make about his skin color? I rather doubt that "ethnicity" was much on his mind at the time, so why yours now?
 
Liberals just plain make me sick sometimes.
 
And conservatives make ME sick. Did you not look at the FIRST response to the original?  Do you not think "gang related" dismisses the act of this young man?  Do you not think "gang related" relates to race?  Yet that was the FIRST response to this thread.  Personally, I found that AND the "lol" by the same CONSERVATIVE poster to be rather repugnant.  Yet you haven't called "your side" out on that.  It's a dumb n-----r boy in a gang that got killed.  At least according to conservatives (that you don't call out)
 
Even YOU got into defending guns right up to the point that I pointed out the kid died protecting someone else. And I apparently am turning it political because I mentioned he was black.  But you defended guns before you called out your conservative friends for defending guns AND implicating that the kid was at fault before you ever mentioned the brave deed the kid performed. 
 
And Libtards make ME sick! What's BaRacks first response to the San Bernardino shootings?
Was it concerning Islamic Terrorism? No! It was gun control!
And Libtards will politicize any heinous act in order to further their agenda!

To quote another leading Libtard, "Don't let a GOOD crisis go to waste"!
 
southwind said:
And Libtards make ME sick! What's BaRacks first response to the San Bernardino shootings?
Was it concerning Islamic Terrorism? No! It was gun control!
And Libtards will politicize any heinous act in order to further their agenda!

To quote another leading Libtard, "Don't let a GOOD crisis go to waste"!
 
Hey East....any comments on someone trying to shift this away from this tragedy to make a political point? 
 
KCFlyer said:
Hey East....any comments on someone trying to shift this away from this tragedy to make a political point?
Stomping your feet and screaming like a little girl really isn't helping your argument.


Ps: lol
 
townpete said:
Stomping your feet and screaming like a little girl really isn't helping your argument.


Ps: lol
Petey....tell your kids to be careful...especially if you live in a bigger city.  I would hate for him to be caught in the crossfire of a gang shooting.  But should that happen, I assure you that I'll be the first to dismiss it as "gang related", and maybe toss in a couple of "lol's" since you seem to find that comforting.  
 
CVwHWy0VAAA7t2U.png
 
KCFlyer said:
Wow.  He didn't have a gun...and it wasn't even clear if he was part of a gang...so he gave his life to save someone else. His death is dismissed by petey as "gang related" (although I rarely see a cop hold back tears discussing the death of a gang banger).    If he DID have a gun...we still dismiss it as "gang related".  We had a 3 year old that was killed in a drive by shooting here in KC a while back.  It was "gang related".  Guess they start them young in those gangs. And I guess that black lives really don't matter.
Again, ignoring the cause, KC.

Address why the gang culture exists, and maybe we wouldn't have innocents being mowed down in the crossfire.

Dozens of people shot and/or killed in Chicago every week due to gangs, including innocents caught in the crossfire, but you don't really hear much about it on MSLSD or KNN. Some of the locals now call it Chiraq.
 
KCFlyer said:
 
Wow.  He didn't have a gun...and it wasn't even clear if he was part of a gang...so he gave his life to save someone else. His death is dismissed by petey as "gang related" (although I rarely see a cop hold back tears discussing the death of a gang banger).    If he DID have a gun...we still dismiss it as "gang related".  We had a 3 year old that was killed in a drive by shooting here in KC a while back.  It was "gang related".  Guess they start them young in those gangs. And I guess that black lives really don't matter. 
 
The shooters where apparently involved in a local gang. The victim was not. I never said he was either. It still qualified by the police as "gang related" even tho the victim was not affiliated, nor a part of it. Rather an innocent bystander. If you have an issue with the terminology then take it up with the police.
 
Still doesn't change the fact that no gun control in the world is going to stop criminals from doing what they do. 
 
townpete said:
 
The shooters where apparently involved in a local gang. The victim was not. I never said he was either. It still qualified by the police as "gang related" even tho the victim was not affiliated, nor a part of it. Rather an innocent bystander. If you have an issue with the terminology then take it up with the police.
 
Still doesn't change the fact that no gun control in the world is going to stop criminals from doing what they do. 
 
Great explanation.  Now explain the "lol"
 

Latest posts

Back
Top