Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AAmech said:JS your right on the money!!! Of course DFW still needs protection. Terminal B is grossly underused and now most of Terminal E is about to be abandoned! And don't forget DFW will open a NEW terminal next year which will be underused as well! Why in the world would we need DAL opened up NOW? Theres PLENTY of room at the Inn!
This is not Chicago or Houston. The comparisons are rediculous. Both of those cities are much larger and have airports which are either full or bursting at the seams (ORD). The Chicago market is so much bigger they're considering building a THIRD airport to relive the other two!
[post="228845"][/post]
KCFlyer said:If I were Southwest then, I would immediately move all operations to DFW....with the stipulation that all AA flights MUST use the East Side runways and Southwest MUST use the west side runways. I recall the days when DFW wasn't nearly as busy as it is today....AA jets would routinely taxi over from the east side of the airport to the west side of the airport to gum up the works of the biggest carrier on the west side of the field at the time - Braniff International.
[post="228866"][/post]
KCFlyer said:If I were Southwest then, I would immediately move all operations to DFW....with the stipulation that all AA flights MUST use the East Side runways and Southwest MUST use the west side runways. I recall the days when DFW wasn't nearly as busy as it is today....AA jets would routinely taxi over from the east side of the airport to the west side of the airport to gum up the works of the biggest carrier on the west side of the field at the time - Braniff International.
But....be careful what you wish for...I have an idea that the very LAST tenent AA wants to see at DFW is LUV. The next to the last one they would want to see set up increased operations is Airtran, and the third from the bottom would be JetBlue. In other words....AA would rather see those terminals ROT than to become occupied by any airline that would bring any sort of low fare competition.
[post="228866"][/post]
JS said:I'm sure AA would be happy to agree. After all, terminals A, C and E are on the east side, so for every WN flight that has to taxi to the other side of the airport, AA gets to use the closest side of the airport for two flights.
Terminal B has a bunch of Eagle flights, but those are actually MQ, not AA, so they can continue to use the west runways under normal conditions.
Be careful what you wish for!
[post="228894"][/post]
Houston is much larger than Dallas? I think you need to check your facts. They are roughly the same size in metro area population.AAmech said:JS your right on the money!!! Of course DFW still needs protection. Terminal B is grossly underused and now most of Terminal E is about to be abandoned! And don't forget DFW will open a NEW terminal next year which will be underused as well! Why in the world would we need DAL opened up NOW? Theres PLENTY of room at the Inn!
This is not Chicago or Houston. The comparisons are rediculous. Both of those cities are much larger and have airports which are either full or bursting at the seams (ORD). The Chicago market is so much bigger they're considering building a THIRD airport to relive the other two!
[post="228845"][/post]
KCFlyer said:Read up on your history and you will discover that years ago, Braniff had the west side and AA and Delta had the east side. Yet for some reason, AA was sending an awful lot of flights over to the west side. Dunno why. And...with terminal E being right on the south end of the field, I would be willing to bet that a SWA jet that had to taxi over to runway 18 would get there sooner than the typical AA jet could go from terminal A to runway 17.
[post="228930"][/post]
AAmech said:As already stated, AA has little to no say in which runways or taxiways it uses. But the logical reason for flights having to taxi over to the west side is that the east side of DFW has THREE terminals and the west side has ONE. Years ago when DL wanted to expand DFW refused permission to them because of the overloading of the east side. They settled for the smaller "EasyStreet".
[post="228939"][/post]
KCFlyer said:If I were Southwest then, I would immediately move all operations to DFW....with the stipulation that all AA flights MUST use the East Side runways and Southwest MUST use the west side runways. I recall the days when DFW wasn't nearly as busy as it is today....AA jets would routinely taxi over from the east side of the airport to the west side of the airport to gum up the works of the biggest carrier on the west side of the field at the time - Braniff International.
But....be careful what you wish for...I have an idea that the very LAST tenent AA wants to see at DFW is LUV. The next to the last one they would want to see set up increased operations is Airtran, and the third from the bottom would be JetBlue. In other words....AA would rather see those terminals ROT than to become occupied by any airline that would bring any sort of low fare competition.
[post="228866"][/post]
JS said:What is your point? New York has around five times as many people in the metro area. Mentioning SWF is about as useful as mentioning ACT or SPS in this discussion -- it's a dinky little airport 90 miles out in the country.
Why do you always have to end your posts with a labor rant? This topic has nothing to do with labor.
[post="228596"][/post]
AAmech said:Personally I think WN at DFW is the best senario for AA as their products contrast the most.
[post="228947"][/post]
JS said:It is fair because Southwest gets to use Love Field while AA cannot. In exchange for being allowed to use a more convenient airport with lower costs comes the restriction of destinations served.
Letting Southwest fly anywhere they want out of Love Field would be unfair to AA, and letting both WN and AA fly anywhere out of DAL would be unfair to DFW.
[post="228815"][/post]
KCFlyer said:Back in the Braniff days however, it was AA and Delta on the east - Braniff and everybody else on the west....
[post="228944"][/post]
Bob Owens said:The point is that you seem to want to protect an airport. I thought that in our free market system it was survival of the fittest and let the market decide? At least thats what the workers are told(labor rant). If DFW should not exist then let it die. Why should the people of Dallas be inconvenienced to make bond holders rich?
SWF? I didnt bring that up. I dont even know what it is.
Labor rant? Well you have your agenda and I have mine. If you dont like it start your own site and ban me from it. By the way the topic isnt which airline uses which runway either. Its about the Wright amendment and whether or not it should be appealed right? So who cares who uses what runway at DFW.
[post="228973"][/post]
KCFlyer said:Really? What do the 100 or so folks who sit past the FC section get that can illustrate that contrast a little better?
[post="228982"][/post]