USA320Pilot
Veteran
- May 18, 2003
- 8,175
- 1,539
Us Airways Wins Loan Extensions
- Thread starter USA320Pilot
- Start date
Phantom Fixer
Veteran
- Oct 21, 2003
- 577
- 0
totobird said:
Simple, The judge does the math and sees U's ask not matching the actual need. Others have shown that U can survive this situation even without employee concessions. See todays business section in the CLT Observer
What's good for the Goose is good for the Gandor...Clip me for 23%...Clip yourself in an alike ratio fashion, unless managements interests in U's survival are not the same as the employee's?
A friend of mine was at the hearing last week and said the company presented charts, graphs and figures showing the dire need for the 23% paycut or possible liquidation. He said the information was overwhelming and that all the unions did were to stand up and cry "We can't take any more cuts".
He said the unions presented no factual information as to why we should not take the cut.
With oil hitting $54 a barrel today even the 23% cut may not be enough to save USAirways.
He said the unions presented no factual information as to why we should not take the cut.
With oil hitting $54 a barrel today even the 23% cut may not be enough to save USAirways.
usairways_vote_NO
Veteran
- Sep 9, 2002
- 1,882
- 57
Can you smell pressure and blackmail Judge Mitchell we see through this farce
Rephrase that silly statement mama man to read: "This pretty much seals the fate of U because the unions will never agree to such nonsense, no gold will be made with pissed of labor".jack mama said:
You and the captain kill me believing a few people making threats and maneuvers will change the U employees mental outlook and make them see things your distorted and very twisted ways.
U is finished and this only delays the inevitable.
firstamendment
Veteran
- Apr 1, 2003
- 1,348
- 0
USA320Pilot,
I have defended your right to voice your opinion, but to be frank, I am low on patience these days.
I have been wanting to say this for a long time and it will be worth a trip to the cornfield.
PLEASE, FOR ONCE, JUST SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!
:unsure: 
I have defended your right to voice your opinion, but to be frank, I am low on patience these days.
I have been wanting to say this for a long time and it will be worth a trip to the cornfield.
PLEASE, FOR ONCE, JUST SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!
:unsure: usairways_vote_NO
Veteran
- Sep 9, 2002
- 1,882
- 57
FirstAmendment that was pretty harsh
Phantom Fixer
Veteran
- Oct 21, 2003
- 577
- 0
Hope777 said:
Hope777,
There lies 50% of the problem....Not one single Non-Labor assaulting problem has been addressed in this 1.5 Billion in asvings they claim to need...not a single dime has been realized other than the single swing of the bat at labor.
The other 50% of the problem is labor whom has given with real money..real jobs is again being asked or forced to bare a disperportionate amount of the burden.
A formula like this ..is a formula for continued failure.....and let's hope to Christ that Judge Mitchell sees it for what it is , A Land Grab
firstamendment said:USA320Pilot,
I have defended your right to voice your opinion, but to be frank, I am low on patience these days.
I have been wanting to say this for a long time and it will be worth a trip to the cornfield.
PLEASE, FOR ONCE, JUST SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!
[post="190138"][/post]
from an advocate of ,among other things,the expression of freedom of speech?
easy first amendment!
If the judge does dictate forced changes on the unions, then uses police powers to prevent job action, that will be a very dark day for American values and American workers. It will signal to the corporate elite that it doesn't matter how incompetent, how lackidasical, or how corrupt you are . . . . you can count on the police powers of the state to do what hired company thugs did 70 years ago.
