SparrowHawk
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2009
- Messages
- 7,824
- Reaction score
- 2,707
Companies aren't here for morality, they're here for profit. I admit there isn't necessarily anything wrong with "doing the right thing" whatever that might be, but that's subjective, and goes beyond what they're obligated to do. In addition, doing the right thing, again, violates your A, which is sticking to the policy. So which is it? Stick with the policy? Stick with the policy, but make exceptions anyway? Treat each passenger differently?
Policies can be written in such a way as to allow room for exceptions. I worked for a company that was a stickler for following policy and procedure. What was interesting is that I had a pad of "Exception To Policy" forms which if I thought a rule should be bent I wrote up the request and faxed it to HQ and got an answer within 24 hours. Company didn't care if you used 1 or 100 forms a day so long as you made business sense. What they cared about was your customer satisfaction rating as they surveyed our key customers quarterly.
US has a software that can easily go through e-mails and route complaints based upon certain keywords so it would be easy to collect requests for refunds due to illness, have them reviewed as exceptions to policy with the staff handling those cases granted some room to negotiate.
US Airways could even make the customer agree not to disclose any agreement reached as a condition. There is a way to provide timely & compassionate customer service. US Airways has most of the infrastructure and people in place to perform this task. Right now it just lacks the will to do so.