USA320Pilot said:
Again, once US Airways stabilizes itself there could be a corproate transaction in the company's future, which could be a RSA financed UCT/ICT, AF-KLM type of merger, or a true merger.
Sorry USA320pilot, but it's painfullt obvious to most that you are once again latching onto one small sentence in an article and ignoring the entire message. I believe it's called taking something out of context.
🙄
As Cosmo pointed out, did you miss the 2 paragraphs prior to the part you cut and pasted????
Let me quote it for you just incase...
"
He said it's too early to tell whether the airline will sell assets after retaining investment banker Morgan Stanley to seek offers. But to maintain credibility with Morgan Stanley and bidders, it's important to make a decision within a few months, he said. "
If you stay in the red, you sell assets," he said. "Once you get in the black, it's a new game."
Retirement Systems of Alabama, which gained control of the airline during its bankruptcy, won't put more money into US Airways now. "
You never want to throw good money after bad ... to save something that's bleeding," he said."
Please spare me the same old comments about how "quickly" the UA employees come onto YOUR precious site to refute your comments. If you talk about us and spread your never ending sepculations as fact, we will come and offer some objective counter viewpoints.
Sure...
IF US turns profitable then it (US, not RSA) could invest in aquiring assets (such as 60 more airplanes, or ratty old 767-200 that someone else no longer wants). Similarly, If I win the lottery I can retire early. But somehow reality always seems to spoil the grandest of fantasies. Oh well... :down: