FMLA states that at the dicretion of a company they may allow accrued balances of sick, vacation, pto, or any other form of paid absevce to run concurrent with fmla.
FMLA is basically for employees who do not have a company policy, i.e. cba that strictly addresses FMLA. if an employee has a cba or other company policy that is set that covers these kinds of issues then the FMLA may not have much to do with it
for example.. a married couple that works for the same company may take FMLA for the birth of a child, but it is only capped at 12 weeks total for both, not 12 weeks for each. that is the FMLA law, now if the company wanted to allow each of the couple 12 weeks a piece, the FMLA would not matter
alas a man can take up to 12 weeks FMLA unpaid for the birth of a child as a "bonding time time" or to care for mama if she needed a c-section etc... company policy and the cba does not allow for this only o the extent of the FMLA guarntees
FMLA is basically for employees who do not have a company policy, i.e. cba that strictly addresses FMLA. if an employee has a cba or other company policy that is set that covers these kinds of issues then the FMLA may not have much to do with it
for example.. a married couple that works for the same company may take FMLA for the birth of a child, but it is only capped at 12 weeks total for both, not 12 weeks for each. that is the FMLA law, now if the company wanted to allow each of the couple 12 weeks a piece, the FMLA would not matter
alas a man can take up to 12 weeks FMLA unpaid for the birth of a child as a "bonding time time" or to care for mama if she needed a c-section etc... company policy and the cba does not allow for this only o the extent of the FMLA guarntees