747,
UAL has traditionally lowered it's lease rates by taking an equity stake in the jet (extra cash up front). Think of it as a "lease to own" proposition. As UAL got closer to ownership of the jet (end of the lease term), the accrued "equity" in that jet. In other words, once the lease is over, they owned it, and thus had the value of that ownership on the balance sheet. When the lease were rejected, they lost that equity, BUT in return, get to lease the jet for MUCH cheaper rates in the future (but the leasor gets to keep his 20 year old 737, instead of it becoming an UAL static display at DIA like that 727...) Net effect is a "special charge" but no money is really lost)
UAL has traditionally lowered it's lease rates by taking an equity stake in the jet (extra cash up front). Think of it as a "lease to own" proposition. As UAL got closer to ownership of the jet (end of the lease term), the accrued "equity" in that jet. In other words, once the lease is over, they owned it, and thus had the value of that ownership on the balance sheet. When the lease were rejected, they lost that equity, BUT in return, get to lease the jet for MUCH cheaper rates in the future (but the leasor gets to keep his 20 year old 737, instead of it becoming an UAL static display at DIA like that 727...) Net effect is a "special charge" but no money is really lost)