you truly are dense aren't you? and once again, you can't debate a topic without turning it into a personal pissing contest and bringing up outside interests.
and you count US/HP as an example of how things are SUPPOSED to work? most consider the perfect case of airline mgmt playing unions against each other - to mgmt's benefit.
can you tell us what union your employees are represented by?
why should anyone get laid off PERIOD only to be given the option to be rehired by a subsidiary of the same oompany?
The whole notion that UA needs to lay off anyone is a joke if they are hiring at sCO, which they are.
,
UA is dividing its workforce years into the merger and playing one union against the other.
with dozens of sUA 757s leaving the fleet, it will only get worse....
THAT is sad no matter what you want to call it.
The fact that you can't seem to get it while trolling these boards highlights again why unions have failed and you represent the worst reasons why.
but hey, it's just me who sees the real nature of what is going on.. or else I write professionally.
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-01-23/with-flight-attendant-fight-united-continental-merger-looks-far-from-finished?campaign_id=yhoo
Clarke, the union spokesman, says a single contract would obviate the need for the annual attendant furloughs. “If it was a good idea in 2010, do it, finish the merger,” he says. “Fix it that way.”