WestCoastGuy
Veteran
- Jun 27, 2004
- 813
- 0
Thank you for your words of encouragement. We'll all bend over one more time. Best wishes for your investments. Hope none are in this company.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
Labor has almost exclusively demanded higher wages and more benefits. You industry can’t handle the current high cost structure. Don’t compare yourself with Southwest as they are making money. They can support and sustain the current salaries; your salaries are breaking your airline.
In everyday life, most people practice adherence to a code of ethics. There is a huge difference between “church†ethics and “business†ethics. Business ethics is designed to maximize the success of the corporation. Business ethics often does not take into serious consideration the well being of those at the bottom (rank-and-file employees). Your executives are bound to act in the best interests of the creditors, shareholders and customers first, with employees only receiving marginal attention at best.
Just thought I'd add that back in August I sold my US Airways stock and reinvested it in Papa Johns...... got me a good deal too, 2 large 2 toppings with an order of chicken strips for 17.99WestCoastGuy said:Thank you for your words of encouragement. We'll all bend over one more time. Best wishes for your investments. Hope none are in this company.
[post="200786"][/post]
700UW said:You could not be more off kilter if you tried.
Frank Lorenzo killed Eastern Airlines, not Charlie Bryan.
Lorenzo stole System One and charged EA horrific fees for each reservation, made EA buy fuel from Texas International at above market rates, took some A300s from EA and have them to CO with no money give to EA for the planes.
You have no idea of what happened at EA and your sense of history is distorted.
The IAM finally had enough and struck, ALPA and TWU also struck, so when all unionized workers strike a carrier, it is not because of one union's problems it is a management problem
Lorenzo treated workers with such disteem he was removed from control of Eastern Airlines by the Bankruptcy Court and replaced with Martin Shugrue as a Trustee.
Then the Department of Labor and Department of Transportation has banned Lorenzo from the industry, funny Charlie Bryan was not banned from ever working for an airline, yet Lorenzo was banned totally from the industry forever.
[post="200792"][/post]
deano said:Jack, you always make an appearance when things are dire, you stir the pot and then you are gone. I remember you from way back on round one.
You are a typical lawyer and as such hold as much credibility as the typical stereo typed blacked suited two tongued creatures you people are.
I have some of your posts and my replies stored away for proof of your nonsense. You are probably Jerry Glass’s brother or personal buddy, hit the road!
[post="200788"][/post]
Uinvestor said:The employees should study the history of EAL and how union leaders can lead to the destruction of a company. Charlie Bryan was an egomaniac, anti-management enthusiast that led a group of militant machinists to the downfall of a great airline. He is the definition of a true leader, someone that leads an entire airline into liquidation. That is not the type of leader that I would want to follow.
Unfortunately, US Airways’ IAM group doesn’t have any true leaders from what I read from the posters. What type of leadership do you guys have that they don’t even provide timely updates with the negotiations? I perceive your leadership to be very weak. All talk but no action.
The employees use lines like "You can only kick a dog so much before it turns and bites your foot!" to justify their opposition. That dog is about to be put out of its misery permanently for constantly biting.
The only union leader that I would put in the same category as Charlie Bryan is Teddy Xidas. The media loves her one line quotes. It is my opinion that she has her own self-serving interests and a blatant disregard for her membership.
Do the employees really understand the consequences of a “no†vote? I see this same union stupidity that destroyed EAL. Go ahead…make a strong statement to your executives and take a hard stance by striking. That will really show them as they move on to another company making more money, while the rank-and-file employees are still looking for entry-level jobs.
Labor has almost exclusively demanded higher wages and more benefits. You industry can’t handle the current high cost structure. Don’t compare yourself with Southwest as they are making money. They can support and sustain the current salaries; your salaries are breaking your airline.
In everyday life, most people practice adherence to a code of ethics. There is a huge difference between “church†ethics and “business†ethics. Business ethics is designed to maximize the success of the corporation. Business ethics often does not take into serious consideration the well being of those at the bottom (rank-and-file employees). Your executives are bound to act in the best interests of the creditors, shareholders and customers first, with employees only receiving marginal attention at best.
If I may offer some advice to Jerry Glass: If the unions give you any trouble, break 'em.
Jack
[post="200784"][/post]
delldude said:just trying to keep the sanity...one post at a time...thanks everyone....
[post="200776"][/post]
Uinvestor said:The employees should study the history of EAL and how union leaders can lead to the destruction of a company. Charlie Bryan was an egomaniac, anti-management enthusiast that led a group of militant machinists to the downfall of a great airline. He is the definition of a true leader, someone that leads an entire airline into liquidation. That is not the type of leader that I would want to follow.
Unfortunately, US Airways’ IAM group doesn’t have any true leaders from what I read from the posters. What type of leadership do you guys have that they don’t even provide timely updates with the negotiations? I perceive your leadership to be very weak. All talk but no action.
The employees use lines like "You can only kick a dog so much before it turns and bites your foot!" to justify their opposition. That dog is about to be put out of its misery permanently for constantly biting.
The only union leader that I would put in the same category as Charlie Bryan is Teddy Xidas. The media loves her one line quotes. It is my opinion that she has her own self-serving interests and a blatant disregard for her membership.
Do the employees really understand the consequences of a “no†vote? I see this same union stupidity that destroyed EAL. Go ahead…make a strong statement to your executives and take a hard stance by striking. That will really show them as they move on to another company making more money, while the rank-and-file employees are still looking for entry-level jobs.
Labor has almost exclusively demanded higher wages and more benefits. You industry can’t handle the current high cost structure. Don’t compare yourself with Southwest as they are making money. They can support and sustain the current salaries; your salaries are breaking your airline.
In everyday life, most people practice adherence to a code of ethics. There is a huge difference between “church†ethics and “business†ethics. Business ethics is designed to maximize the success of the corporation. Business ethics often does not take into serious consideration the well being of those at the bottom (rank-and-file employees). Your executives are bound to act in the best interests of the creditors, shareholders and customers first, with employees only receiving marginal attention at best.
If I may offer some advice to Jerry Glass: If the unions give you any trouble, break 'em.
Jack
[post="200784"][/post]
PineyBob said:Well I have some dumb assed comments but this is one of the dumber ones.
[post="200761"][/post]
Uinvestor said:The employees should study the history of EAL and how union leaders can lead to the destruction of a company. Charlie Bryan was an egomaniac, anti-management enthusiast that led a group of militant machinists to the downfall of a great airline. He is the definition of a true leader, someone that leads an entire airline into liquidation. That is not the type of leader that I would want to follow.
Unfortunately, US Airways’ IAM group doesn’t have any true leaders from what I read from the posters. What type of leadership do you guys have that they don’t even provide timely updates with the negotiations? I perceive your leadership to be very weak. All talk but no action.
The employees use lines like "You can only kick a dog so much before it turns and bites your foot!" to justify their opposition. That dog is about to be put out of its misery permanently for constantly biting.
The only union leader that I would put in the same category as Charlie Bryan is Teddy Xidas. The media loves her one line quotes. It is my opinion that she has her own self-serving interests and a blatant disregard for her membership.
Do the employees really understand the consequences of a “no†vote? I see this same union stupidity that destroyed EAL. Go ahead…make a strong statement to your executives and take a hard stance by striking. That will really show them as they move on to another company making more money, while the rank-and-file employees are still looking for entry-level jobs.
Labor has almost exclusively demanded higher wages and more benefits. You industry can’t handle the current high cost structure. Don’t compare yourself with Southwest as they are making money. They can support and sustain the current salaries; your salaries are breaking your airline.
In everyday life, most people practice adherence to a code of ethics. There is a huge difference between “church†ethics and “business†ethics. Business ethics is designed to maximize the success of the corporation. Business ethics often does not take into serious consideration the well being of those at the bottom (rank-and-file employees). Your executives are bound to act in the best interests of the creditors, shareholders and customers first, with employees only receiving marginal attention at best.
If I may offer some advice to Jerry Glass: If the unions give you any trouble, break 'em.
Jack
[post="200784"][/post]