Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IF your definition of censorship is fact checking and warning about a flat out lie, then X doesn't do that. From what I understand, they only censor flight trackers for Elon's jet.Again tell me which Social Media sites engage in censorship? If a Media site, TV, Radio or Internet 🛜 makes sure to restrict information wouldn’t that be considered censorship by omission?
View attachment 17564
IF your definition of censorship is fact checking and warning about a flat out lie, then X doesn't do that. From what I understand, they only censor flight trackers for Elon's jet.
And again....if the "journalist" spouts election BS that got his company fined and himself fired, then it doesnt' matter if the guy interviews someone who claims the world is flat - even if 100 billion people watch it - it doesn't make it accurate. Carlson's past activities make his credibility questionable
One man’s facts are another man’s bullchit. Unless of course you see it with your own eyes and even then your mind could be playing tricks on you.
BTW FYI the more groups fight so so so so hard to convince another group of something the more they’re going to dig in their heals and not listen or trust.
I absolutely certainly don’t trust the “powers” that be on much especially regarding what their supposed intention are.
One man’s facts are another man’s bullchit. Unless of course you see it with your own eyes and even then your mind could be playing tricks on you.
BTW FYI the more groups fight so so so so hard to convince another group of something the more they’re going to dig in their heals and not listen or trust.
I absolutely certainly don’t trust the “powers” that be on much especially regarding what their supposed intentions are.
That's nice. Do you trust Dan Rather? I only asked because he was sleazy about one thing regarding W and was completely dismissed by the right. Tucker is the right's Rather.
Good for you. Many on your side who embrace Tucker and believe that he has integrity agree with you that he is "telling the other side of the story". Those same people lend Dan Rather no credence for lying in one story. Yet they watched Tucker knowingly lie for months.trust my personal instincts and common sense. Party or ideological fealty is for suckers.
You can’t get that though can you? You “need” to identify with something.
Good for you. Many on your side who embrace Tucker and believe that he has integrity agree with you that he is "telling the other side of the story". Those same people lend Dan Rather no credence for lying in one story. Yet they watched Tucker knowingly lie for months.