Trump Polling

Status
Not open for further replies.
KCFlyer said:
 
I'm not trying to paint anything other than the fact that the right has had a hard on for Benghazi for 4 years.  If Hillary wins, we'll get 4 more years of Benghazimania.  If Trump wins, the right will still want to see Hillary prosecuted for the email thing, and I honestly don't think they would mind if president trump gave the Russians  the nuclear codes, so long as they could finally find that smoking gun email.  The right has still not recovered from Watergate. 
 
Hard on because, as revealed in testimony before the House Committee, the President and Secretary of State all conspired to lie to the American people and even more tragically, the families of those killed in Benghazi.
 
Also exposed was the lie that there was no time to respond.
 
Funny you bring up Watergate......wasn't Nixon impeached for lying to the American people?
 
delldude said:
 
Hard on because, as revealed in testimony before the House Committee, the President and Secretary of State all conspired to lie to the American people and even more tragically, the families of those killed in Benghazi.
 
Also exposed was the lie that there was no time to respond.
 
Funny you bring up Watergate......wasn't Nixon impeached for lying to the American people?
 
 
ouch that's going to leave a mark lmao!!
 
delldude said:
 
Hard on because, as revealed in testimony before the House Committee, the President and Secretary of State all conspired to lie to the American people and even more tragically, the families of those killed in Benghazi.
 
Also exposed was the lie that there was no time to respond.
 
Funny you bring up Watergate......wasn't Nixon impeached for lying to the American people?
 
Nixon never gave the country the opportunity...he resigned.  The right was been out for revenge ever since.  Witness whitewater, travelgate, troopergate, monicagate, bengahzigate, emailgate and any other gate they can come up with.  
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
No

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/watergate/articles/072874-1.htm

And you want to lay the death of 4 people at the feet of Clinton. How many already lost their loved ones over the bullshit Iraq crap? Maybe if it was only one event, you could laser focus on it like you and your buddies here have. Dear Leader Trump will serve you well.
 
Unequivocally yes.
 
Has absolutely nothing to do with Trump, only Hillary and Obama.
 
 
 
The first such impeachment recommendation in more than a century, it charges President Nixon with unlawful activities that formed a "course of conduct or plan" to obstruct the investigation of the Watergate break-in and to cover up other unlawful activities.
 
Insert lying here.
 
Not quite. You cannot just "insert lying here".

It would have been quite a show if Nixon had stayed around for it.

No article of impeachment was ever brought for him lying.
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Not quite. You cannot just "insert lying here".

It would have been quite a show if Nixon had stayed around for it.

No article of impeachment was ever brought for him lying.
 
Obviously you haven't bothered to read Nixon's Articles of impeachment then.
 
 
Article 1: Obstruction of Justice.

In his conduct of the office of the President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, in that: On June 17, 1972, and prior thereto, agents of the Committee for the Re-Election of the President committed unlawful entry of the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee in Washington, District of Columbia, for the purpose of securing political intelligence. Subsequent thereto, Richard M. Nixon, using the powers of his high office, engaged personally and through his subordinates and agents in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede and obstruct investigations of such unlawful entry; to cover up, conceal and protect those responsible and to conceal the existence and scope of other unlawful covert activities. The means used to implement this course of conduct or plan have included one or more of the following:
 
(1) Making or causing to be made false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employes of the United States.
 
(2) Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employes of the United States.
 
(3) Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counseling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employes of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings.
 
(4) Interfering or endeavoring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force and congressional committees.
 
(5) Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payments of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities.
 
(6) Endeavoring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States.
 
(7) Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employes of the United States for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability.
 
(8) Making false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation has been conducted with respect to allegation of misconduct on the part of personnel of the Executive Branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-Election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct; or
 
(9) Endeavoring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favored treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.
In all of this, Richard M. Nixon has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
 
Wherefore Richard M. Nixon, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.
(Approved by a vote of 27-11 by the House Judiciary Committee on Saturday, July 27, 1974.)
http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/impeachments/nixon.htm
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Captain-Picard-Facepalm.jpg
 
 
In connection with his squabble with the Gold Star family, one of his supporters really should tell Mr. Trump that when you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is STOP DIGGING.  This is a battle he cannot win.
 
jimntx said:
In connection with his squabble with the Gold Star family, one of his supporters really should tell Mr. Trump that when you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is STOP DIGGING.  This is a battle he cannot win.
 
Sad, but typical that DNC would play the game as such.
 
Pat Smith was fact checked and smeared by the media after the RNC with nary a spoken word.
 
Trump was set up, no doubt.
 
If he apologized and moved on, the media would be stunned.
 
delldude said:
 
Sad, but typical that DNC would play the game as such.
 
Pat Smith was fact checked and smeared by the media after the RNC with nary a spoken word.
 
Trump was set up, no doubt.
 
If he apologized and moved on, the media would be stunned.
 
Indeed they would.  But true to form, Donald didn't let them down.  Kind of like sending pictures of his hands to a reporter every year for 20 years.    Trump was easily baited...Trump showed how he lacks the ability to deal with it.  Doesn't make him look very "presidential".    I"m just wondering why this family wasn't supportive of Donald's stand on banning Muslims.   Had that been in place back in 2004, their son would never have been a member of the United States Military and would never have lost his life in the first place.   
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top