EricLv2Fish
Veteran
- Aug 25, 2005
- 1,171
- 5
Certainely there is some good in everything, even in this merger between East and West. You'd never know it if all you read was this board. Some have lost sight of the fact there is good in most everything if one looks in the right place. Maybe they haven't lost sight, but rather have lost faith for whatever reason. Understandbly the wounds of 2 recent bankruptcies have folks on edge and worried they will get "beaten" again. This board seems to be a one-sided tool to vent anger from all the bad experiences of the past, but there has to come a point when the past must be left behind and the future given a chance. I would hope that every post on this thread would include at least one good thing the merger has brought about along with any venting of the bad or ugly. Maybe starting small is better. Howbout just one thread. I'll start:
I've non-reved on US metal several times and found the East employees very professional. Very good experience that helped put my mind at ease about the "Easties" That's good.
The "Cost Neutral" hardline stance seems to be a stance that is not negotiable. CSAs on the West will be brought up to the payscale of the East CSAs. This is cost neutral so to speak because the East is the surviving contract. On the other hand concerning the mechanics, If the East contract prevails many of us on the West will see paycuts and loss of benefits. Improving the IAM contract so we don't have to take paycuts on the West is not cost neutral. If this holds to be true...Bad and Ugly. Go IBT, it's our only chance to improve our situation.
It's not hard really and would be refreshing to bring some balance to at least one thread on this board.
I've non-reved on US metal several times and found the East employees very professional. Very good experience that helped put my mind at ease about the "Easties" That's good.
The "Cost Neutral" hardline stance seems to be a stance that is not negotiable. CSAs on the West will be brought up to the payscale of the East CSAs. This is cost neutral so to speak because the East is the surviving contract. On the other hand concerning the mechanics, If the East contract prevails many of us on the West will see paycuts and loss of benefits. Improving the IAM contract so we don't have to take paycuts on the West is not cost neutral. If this holds to be true...Bad and Ugly. Go IBT, it's our only chance to improve our situation.
It's not hard really and would be refreshing to bring some balance to at least one thread on this board.