WeAAsles said:
What is up with all this Hooker talk? Since when did we all start hating on naked women? Man we're getting old now. Clinton got a BJ once and was busted, so what. He also likes Flowers, remember her.
Let's break down the money though a little and get away from the perception we all obviously have of this incident which is now obviously going to be handled with the DOL involved.
The impropriety looks like it may come out to around a Million (not counting if there were possibly bad investments?)
The fund holds currently 10.9 BILLION Dollars. That's 10,900 MILLION Dollars if you break it down by size. So if you're bank account has $10,900 DOLLARS in it by size difference it's basically as if $1,00 ONE DOLLAR was scimmed from the trust. Will that damage the payouts if that's all it was? No.
Now the fact that these guys may have been busted will most certainly protect the fund much better in the future. So possibly that could be the silver lining in all of this?
Didn't you just run for office? A year ago you claimed you would never choose the IAMPF over
over a 401K match, now in an earlier post on this thread you now say you would consider the IAMPF?
And now you are playing the good clean up boy for a bunch of blue collar Bernie Madoff's with
your stupid silver lining statement.
I truly do not to wish the IAM members retirement plan anything but success, but I'am not willing
to put a penny into it for what I consider it only a cash influx band-aid. What the plan needs is members
who work for companies that want to add employees, not employees of an airline looking to outsource
as many union jobs as they can.
The abuse of the plans funds is just ridicules, the thought of anyone thinking they deserve a Christmas
party with the funds of working men & women is wrong. To take the party to the level that they did may
not be criminal in the eyes of the law but it is to me.