I had a great crew on LAX-CLT last Saturday: They were very on top of the overhead bin situation, and as soon as the bins filled up, the FA in the back alerted the FA towards the front of Y, who alerted the FA at the front.......and the next thing you knew, everybody else who boarded did so with just their small under-the-seat bags.
The key to solving the overhead bin problem is for the crew to enforce the carry-on regulations, monitor the availability of overhead space, and start tagging carry-ons once the space fills up.
If US claims that they made this change to make it easier for Preferred's to stow their carry-ons, my response would be stricter enforcement of the carry-on regulations, and an elite boarding carpet so elites can board at their leisure and not get stuck behind the school group traveling to band camp.
All of us who post here know the truth: The elites were grabbing all of the "choice seats" for free, leaving less seats for US to sell so that they could meet their ancillary revenue goals. Therefore, punish the elites by making them pay extra, too. Elites are the most likely to value these seats and (theoretically) be willing to pay extra for them, sooooo........let's just withhold those seats from elites (but allocate a few "Preferred" seats to throw them a bone). If they booked late and paid through the nose, but they value that aisle seat, they can always reach into their deep pockets and pay extra for it when they check in. 🙄
The irony is that someone like myself is the beneficiary of this new policy. I am *G, but unless I ask one of my CP parents to nominate me to DM Silver I cannot select exit row or Preferred seats. So if I cannot reserve an aisle seat in advance, I can pay a few extra dollars on top of my dirt-cheap ticket for an aisle seat which was denied to a CP who booked yesterday (after all F seats had been doled out to the Silvers), and paid full freight. US is basically rewarding me for not being loyal to them anymore. How is that fair to their loyal customers?