USCREW
Veteran
There have been months when I've flown back-to-back-to-back all-nighters, and unless I wanted to drop; I'd be legal to fly them all week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This morning scheduling was really pulling some questionable acts in PHL while covering trips that were opening. They were letting trips sit open for a while before they were covering them and a few became quick calls before they were covered…
One trip in particular was 43019..this is the 2- day Aruba turn that overnights in CLT…this trip sat open for 1:10 before it was covered by a JR Reserve out of LTO order…I called scheduling on this, and the reason I was given is they were working on stuff as fast as they could…I would like them to try and show they had so much going on that they couldn’t cover this trip sooner and in LTO order! (It’s their contract also!)
Anyway, check screen 18 and see if you may be entitled to a claim for the time if you were skipped today by scheduling. I suggest that you put in a claim for the 16:56 the trip pays….I don’t have contacts for everyone on screen 18, so if you see someone’s name you can get in touch with please let them know I’m sure they can use the money…
Pairing 43019 Org. 30 November 2006
70 F/A’s skipped
Trip opened at 0845
Covered at 0955
I tried to call the AFA officers to get some feedback about how to handle this but no one is there today. O’ its there last day in office isn’t it?
very detailed question & answer really with some "it depends" in there.I don't know how to tell if i'm skipped or not? Every time I ask scheduling how they cover trips, daily vs. quick calls, I never get a straight answer. I was on furlough for 3 yrs and just returned in June. This whole LTO system is new to me. Can anyone explain how to tell if you have been skipped and when scheduling should quick call vs. daily call?
I had a similar situation happen to me while sitting OPR. A trip was open for almost two hours before they finally decided to call the reserves sitting OPR. They said they could not call and give it to a f/a if OPR f/a's were on duty. I have NEVER heard of such a thing. Andy at least you caught this. Different situations happen that many and I do mean MANY don't know their contract. Thanks for the info.
Thank you...also agree with your other post why would a RSV want a trip at month end??? Andy should take a job at crew skd to help them out...it took so long to cover if they all ROC or wanted to be REL...guess Andy's twisted he did not get the union job...All i know, was that the OPR phone rang at 0930 and a few FAs on the extra section of OPR passed it to one of the junior guys. He accepted it way before 0955. He bolted out of the crew room to get to gate A26. Even after he accepted the trip, crew sched didnt put him on it till 0955. Must have been busy.
Not at all! Brian will be great and I have already offered my help to him and the new officers of the local. Some people :down: , you don’t know me, if you did you wouldn’t make comments like that. My involvement is purely selfless. I was just letting folks know they may be entitled to a claim for the time. No trip should sit open for over an hour before its covered...another thing Scheduling cant just add OPRs as they wish, they have been adding two and three additional OPR's as daily calls and also adding additional OPR pairings out of their a$$ read section 11. They have to utilize the scheduled OPR’s before they can call out another (11.G.11) So anyone who sat on OPR as a "daily call" and missed a trip that went to another AVL daily f/a that they would have been able to hold is due that claim as well.Andy should take a job at crew skd to help them out...it took so long to cover if they all ROC or wanted to be REL...guess Andy's twisted he did not get the union job...
Just curious...why is adding additional OPRs against the contract? Wouldn't it be the same as systems adding necessary extra pairings (i.e. unpublished systems trips)? Is it stated in the contract that it's illegal to add OPRs?Well if adding additional OPR's is against the contract they sure don't seem to care. They just added an extra 4 OPR positions for today. Pairing 10493 9:30am to 1:15.
Just curious...why is adding additional OPRs against the contract? Wouldn't it be the same as systems adding necessary extra pairings (i.e. unpublished systems trips)? Is it stated in the contract that it's illegal to add OPRs?
Couldn't this statement be said on a daily basis allowing leeway for creation of systems pairing or extra OPR staffing at scheduling's discretion?http://www.afausairways.org/contract/index1.html
...system irregularities due to unforeseen circumstances …