Thanks for your usual boost of confidence. In another post, didn't you claim to be supportive of this merger?
My usual boost of confidence? Hey, I tell it like I see it, and require nobody to agree with me.....I think as always, people get caught up in "bigger is better". To them I say, if this is true, please explain SWA and B6's success? Also, someone please run the US Air numbers with AA's new labor costs, you will find US Air's profits would be much smaller. Its easy to run a profitable company off slave labor rates......
Btw, I NEVER said I blindly support a merger. What I said is I felt so bad for Alliance and believe a strong Alliance and Tulsa could mean good things for AA if they were leveraged properly (like doing maintenance for other companies not just AA) and that I would almost support a merger if it meant Alliance would stay open. So, I'm not blindly attached to one side, I just think overall US Air brings the southeast to the table, but that does not outway the issues she brings.
I also think Horton has not been given a fair chance, people are grouping him in with people like Brundage that they have grow (a rightly so) to loath. He really did a good job with AT&T, I know former executives and lower level employees there (rescent ones) that speak VERY highly of that that company. I think AA employees have enough problems as it is without bringing the labor issues at US Air into the picture. I think Parker's track record with labor is no better than ANY current AA management team member, and he clearly shows his incompetance in building a route structure. He has developed a domestic airline, passed up oppurtunities to expand into China and has based his entire plan on finding a company with an international presence to do what he couldn't do. He struck out twice already and knows this is his last shot.
I just think a huge fleet order, new livery, new contracts and control over the appointment of a new board and management team would give AA unions exactly what they need to re-shape AA in their image. A stand alone plan means the unions along with the UCC get to sit back and pick a board and maagement team that they feel will be more equipped to lead AA, while a merger placing Parker in control is just more of the same old same old, with heavy losses during the merger period that may not result in much added value. Maybe together the unions and UCC can grab some outside of the airline industry to infuse new ideas and blood into AA, or at least to infuse a team that can better execute the existing plan. Either way, unions would have control over the leadership at AA.
Finally, as long as this is an all stock deal, I can tell you no analyst or PE group worth a DAMN would take this deal. EVERYONE knows stock value of the combined entity might never be worth much of anything, especially if the company bleeds during the merger process while a stand-alone AA I think will do well enough that over the next 10-years investors will get their money back and then some. I think the only way this merger happens is if UCC gets offered a boat load of cash. I spent time on the street, and had some great mentors there, as well as many still working there, and everyone worth a damn says the same thing to me over a beer: without a huge cash component, UCC is smart enough to tell US air to go pound sand, and I think the APA contract now allows managment to provide the facts and cost certainty to sell their plan. I know most will disagree with me, but I stand by my conclusion.
Sorry Wings for the long response, don't think you were asking for another lengthy opinion, but I gave it anyway......if you read the whole thing, thanks
🙂
Cheers,
777 / 767 / 757