Ken MacTiernan
Veteran
Tulsa World, A12
Opinion
By Staff Reports
11/7/2006
"Past TWU concessions concern AA employees" (Oct. 8) describing the
Transport Workers Union initiative to build up the heavy overhaul
operation at American Airlines in Tulsa, also quoted the views of
several mechanics from AA stations in big cities who criticized the
entire effort.
The article omitted that, without exception, each quoted person was a
leader in Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association's attempt to
displace the TWU as the AA mechanic representative. In fact, they are
on record as advising the TWU membership to take their chances in
bankruptcy rather than agree to the 2003 concessions; several even
took out ads in the Tulsa World to that end.
The results of their advice are illustrated by the fiascoes on AMFA's
watch at Northwest Airlines and United Airlines. No mechanic work
group at a bankrupt carrier has ever emerged from bankruptcy with its
heavy overhaul operation, pension or retiree medical intact. None
have negotiated snap backs on their concessions. Mechanics' pay at
these carriers is significantly below that at AA, which is second in
the passenger industry. Only AA continues to perform the majority of
its heavy maintenance in house.
The concessions continue to hurt, but it should be obvious that
following the advice of Chuck Schalk, Bob Owens and Ken McTiernan
would have had devastating consequences for my coworkers and this
community. Why are they given a regular forum in the World?
Rick Mullings, Claremore
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
My reply:
To the Tulsa World Opinion:
Well, it seems as if Mr. Mullings might have spilled a little much twu kool aid on his key board. I would like to see where I criticized the build up of over haul at AA. I am happy that overhaul is being built up. I only wish the same could be said for those of us OUTSIDE of Tulsa. But I guess Mr. Mullings is unable to comprehend what he reads.
Mr. Mullings goes on to state that the fact that those quoted in the article were in deed AMFA supporters. ( I have not been elected a position in AMFA so being a "leader" is yet another oversight by Mr. Mullings. But thanks for the compliment all the same.) But to add to this statement yes, I was and still am a AMFA supporter. Why must Mr. Mullings and others like him believe that being a supporter of a craft, democratic union for AMTs is a bad thing? I have yet to hear when I will receive a ballot for International Officers in the twu.
What fiascos does Mr. Mullings allude to? The "fiasco" that the IAM allowed to happen at UAL BEFORE AMFA was elected that effectively removed overhaul at that carrier? (Maybe that was "omitted" on his part?) Or perhaps the "fiasco" at NWA where skilled AMTs struck because the company refused to bargain in good faith? These proud men and women did what the twu would crap in their collective shorts if they were ever forced to do. They went on strike. Not only for themselves but for ALL AMTs. Perhaps Mr. Mullings "omitted" the fact that the twu initiated removing A & Ps from the back shops, which in turn forced other airlines to compete by doing the same but then also ratcheting up the erosion of our profession?
Mr. Mullings mentions the term "snap-back". Are they in our concession language? Or were they simply "omitted"? (If Mr. Mullings is referring to the .38 cents that we receive each year on the anniversary of the concession vote I am afraid that Mr. Mullings is unable to comprehend that which he reads. ( See above.) Or does Mr. Mullings refer to the written language that states undeniably that after the concession contract expires we will all wake up and find that our pay and benefits have been returned to their previous pre-concession levels? Or is that particular language "omitted" as well?
Mr. Mullings asks why I, and others are given a regular forum in the Tulsa World. I guess that twu kool aid has taken a very firm hold of his beliefs. I would gather from this statement that only those with a positive view of the twu and those who believe that concessions were a fair trade when only the workforce took pay cuts but upper management received pay RAISES & BONUSES are allowed to have their point of view printed.
Ken MacTiernan
SAN AA AMT
(619) 395-6681
Opinion
By Staff Reports
11/7/2006
"Past TWU concessions concern AA employees" (Oct. 8) describing the
Transport Workers Union initiative to build up the heavy overhaul
operation at American Airlines in Tulsa, also quoted the views of
several mechanics from AA stations in big cities who criticized the
entire effort.
The article omitted that, without exception, each quoted person was a
leader in Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association's attempt to
displace the TWU as the AA mechanic representative. In fact, they are
on record as advising the TWU membership to take their chances in
bankruptcy rather than agree to the 2003 concessions; several even
took out ads in the Tulsa World to that end.
The results of their advice are illustrated by the fiascoes on AMFA's
watch at Northwest Airlines and United Airlines. No mechanic work
group at a bankrupt carrier has ever emerged from bankruptcy with its
heavy overhaul operation, pension or retiree medical intact. None
have negotiated snap backs on their concessions. Mechanics' pay at
these carriers is significantly below that at AA, which is second in
the passenger industry. Only AA continues to perform the majority of
its heavy maintenance in house.
The concessions continue to hurt, but it should be obvious that
following the advice of Chuck Schalk, Bob Owens and Ken McTiernan
would have had devastating consequences for my coworkers and this
community. Why are they given a regular forum in the World?
Rick Mullings, Claremore
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
My reply:
To the Tulsa World Opinion:
Well, it seems as if Mr. Mullings might have spilled a little much twu kool aid on his key board. I would like to see where I criticized the build up of over haul at AA. I am happy that overhaul is being built up. I only wish the same could be said for those of us OUTSIDE of Tulsa. But I guess Mr. Mullings is unable to comprehend what he reads.
Mr. Mullings goes on to state that the fact that those quoted in the article were in deed AMFA supporters. ( I have not been elected a position in AMFA so being a "leader" is yet another oversight by Mr. Mullings. But thanks for the compliment all the same.) But to add to this statement yes, I was and still am a AMFA supporter. Why must Mr. Mullings and others like him believe that being a supporter of a craft, democratic union for AMTs is a bad thing? I have yet to hear when I will receive a ballot for International Officers in the twu.
What fiascos does Mr. Mullings allude to? The "fiasco" that the IAM allowed to happen at UAL BEFORE AMFA was elected that effectively removed overhaul at that carrier? (Maybe that was "omitted" on his part?) Or perhaps the "fiasco" at NWA where skilled AMTs struck because the company refused to bargain in good faith? These proud men and women did what the twu would crap in their collective shorts if they were ever forced to do. They went on strike. Not only for themselves but for ALL AMTs. Perhaps Mr. Mullings "omitted" the fact that the twu initiated removing A & Ps from the back shops, which in turn forced other airlines to compete by doing the same but then also ratcheting up the erosion of our profession?
Mr. Mullings mentions the term "snap-back". Are they in our concession language? Or were they simply "omitted"? (If Mr. Mullings is referring to the .38 cents that we receive each year on the anniversary of the concession vote I am afraid that Mr. Mullings is unable to comprehend that which he reads. ( See above.) Or does Mr. Mullings refer to the written language that states undeniably that after the concession contract expires we will all wake up and find that our pay and benefits have been returned to their previous pre-concession levels? Or is that particular language "omitted" as well?
Mr. Mullings asks why I, and others are given a regular forum in the Tulsa World. I guess that twu kool aid has taken a very firm hold of his beliefs. I would gather from this statement that only those with a positive view of the twu and those who believe that concessions were a fair trade when only the workforce took pay cuts but upper management received pay RAISES & BONUSES are allowed to have their point of view printed.
Ken MacTiernan
SAN AA AMT
(619) 395-6681