What I think is interesting is his response; when did you ever hear Bush say something like that?
Here
And here...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What I think is interesting is his response; when did you ever hear Bush say something like that?
If your talking about finger pointing, Obama is the clear winner. It funny he takes that stance when the whole AIG scheme was exposed as the administrations fault. Thats great that he takes that stance, let see how long it lasts. So far whenever they been backed into a corner their standard response has been "well we inherited this problem" blah blah blah. :down:While I agree that AIG is a train wreck, did you happen to hear what he said at a town hall the other night? I'm (poorly) paraphrasing, but he basically said that both sides needed to stop finger pointing in order to move forward, and that if they needed someone to blame to do so, then they could blame him.
I know your response will be "he *is* to blame," so save the bandwidth. What I think is interesting is his response; when did you ever hear Bush say something like that?
Since when is it govt role to tell you what career you should choose? A lot of the banking community contributed tons of cash to Obama election, including AIG! Without the banking community those other industries wouldn't be where they are today. What an idiot! :down:
Thats a good point, but how would that affect the cost of services the consumer has to pay? Its always great when people are paid more, but it also has the affect of higher costs passed onto the shoulders of the consumer. We are a society of "I want to be paid the most" at the same time "I want the cheapest of everything". Make sense? How should that be reconciled? Maybe the good thing about this whole economic downturn is the return to common sense savings and frugality.While I agree with you (!) that it's not the government's place to tell people what career path to take, I do think he has a valid point (albeit phrased way wrong). The truth of the matter is we as a society NEED people to think about career tracks in fields like civil engineering/skilled trades/etc. and these fields need to pay enough to make them attractive options.
Thats a good point, but how would that affect the cost of services the consumer has to pay? Its always great when people are paid more, but it also has the affect of higher costs passed onto the shoulders of the consumer.
We are a society of "I want to be paid the most" at the same time "I want the cheapest of everything". Make sense?
How should that be reconciled? Maybe the good thing about this whole economic downturn is the return to common sense savings and frugality.
I do not like the idea of any head of state, or potential head of state going on a talk show. I did not like it when Clinton was on playing the sax. I did not like McCain on the Letterman show ...etc. It is unprofessional, and IMO unseemly. They are heads of state and civil servants not celebrities and it's about time we start treating them as such.