Wow are you obtuse. The IAMPF “reserves the right” I contacted an IAMPF rep to verify. It was about a 5 minute call. ☎️
Wow! Imagine that - I called the IAMPF too! You must've gotten the 3-day-old trainee rep, because the individual I discussed this matter with re-emphasized pretty much what I already knew. The IAM and the IAMPF are separate entities.
He pointed out that while the IAM is responsible for organizing members, negotiating contracts, administering contracts, and handling grievances and member defense when required - The IAMPF only handles the fund - Administering duties, investments, distributions.
Further, he pointed out that bound by fiduciary responsibilities under ERISA, in the unfortunate event of an IAM decertification, so long as the new union continued to meet the rules and requirements of the fund (membership not being one) , and the employers agreed upon contributions continued per schedule, that bound by fiduciary responsibility, the now former-IAM members could not be involuntarily removed from the plan, simply out of spite.
Ironically enough he added ... only the
truly obtuse would think otherwise 🤣🤣🤣
I’m done. ✅ Get in the argumentative last word that you need.
I actually wasn't going to respond, but hey since you went and offered ...
Oh and as for you being done? Here's 100 forum bucks 💲💲💲 saying you'll respond - you live here, you're kind of a troll, and you can't help yourself.
Good luck with your negotiations when they happen. 👋
Why thank you - I'm sure that when UAL finally gets back to us it'll be a real hoot.