Loser Tilton

Herkav8r:

I commend you for having the balls to state your position on these message boards. And I happen to agree with you. It's the classic labor-management class warfare rhetoric over and over on these boards.

I don't drink United Koolaid and I am not a United cheerleader, but when one is in a position of leadership, such as Tilton is, one sets themselves up for criticism. Not everybody is going to like you. Especially when tough decisions have to be made. I happen to think that Glenn Tilton earns every penny that UAL pays him. I don't think it has been easy to lead a Fortune-500 company with 60+ thousand employees around the globe, while in the midst of bankruptcy, a war in Iraq, SARS, spiking oil prices, not to mention the harsh domestic operating environment. Most people do not possess the skill-set required to lead such a corporation. If you recall, nobody wanted the job of CEO at UAL and Jack Creighton pleaded with Tilton to accept the job. I personally find it irresponsible and self-destructive when my union leaders call for his resignation.

I personally don't feel "screwed" by United. It is all a matter of perspective and in my experience, even though I happen to be on the labor end of the equation, I do not feel like United has "DONE" anything to me. I don't have anger and resentment or feel victimized by management. I tend to be a realistist and have accepted the realities of the market place. It is the price I have paid for choosing to work for a large company in a deregulated free-market system.

A lot of the perks that we enjoyed prior to Chapter 11 were remnants from a bygone era (a regulated market place). In my 10 years with UAL, I have learned to make the job work for ME. Having pensions gutted, benefits reduced, and pay and workrules cut DOES suck, but, at the end of the day, it's still not a bad gig. I have been on voluntary furlough for two years with FULL benefits...medical, dental, travel, and seniority accrual.... Before bankruptcy I was able to have the luxury of 20 days off per month and attend school 5 days a week...with full pay and bennies. I am not saying that the past few years have been easy, it HAS been painful, but even with two rounds of givebacks, when I return to the line in August, I will be stepping into a job that pays between 40 and 45k per year. For me, it's still workable.

Labor doesn't seem to GET that a bonus program for certain managers, who are hightly credentialed and who bring unique marketable skills to their positions, is part of their compensation package. Traditional collective bargaining agreements do not contain negotiated performance bonuses as part of the compensation package.

I think it is very easy to sit in our armchairs and make comments and judgements about whether or not Glenn Tilton and others are doing a good job when most of us have no clue as to what these managers have to go through day in and day out. Furthermore, I did not have to attend years of college and get an advanced degree to get hired in my position at United. Most people in positions of power have a drive and a strong work ethic and are willing to put in up to 12-18 hours a day at work. They do not have the luxury of being able to play on internet message boards.

Enough said....flame away!
 
whatkindoffreshhell said:
So let Tilton leave!! How on earth can you defend his pathetic record?

You missed my point -- there are several inside UA candidates who truly could lead the company. For a lot less.

Tilton is a faceless bureaucrat. I suppose you thought Leo Mullin was valuable to DL too???
[post="266868"][/post]​

Exactly. Bear obviously thinks CEOs should not lead by example by taking a paycut while everyone else does, even if their cut does not save the company. Tilton has had plenty of time to do what he was supposed to do, and he has failed. It's interesting to see people like Jetz, Drvr, and Bear continue to support him despite his miserable performance. I guess some people are just mesmerized by figures of authority.
 
sastal said:
Exactly. Bear obviously thinks CEOs should not lead by example by taking a paycut while everyone else does, even if their cut does not save the company. Tilton has had plenty of time to do what he was supposed to do, and he has failed. It's interesting to see people like Jetz, Drvr, and Bear continue to support him despite his miserable performance. I guess some people are just mesmerized by figures of authority.
[post="266879"][/post]​

Sastal:

Tilton accepted a pay cut the moment he agreed to come to United. It is not up to you to determine whether or not Tilton has failed in his job at UAL...it is up to the BOD.
 
A lot of the perks that we enjoyed prior to Chapter 11 were remnants from a bygone era (a regulated market place). In my 10 years with UAL, I have learned to make the job work for ME. Having pensions gutted, benefits reduced, and pay and workrules cut DOES suck, but, at the end of the day, it's still not a bad gig. I have been on voluntary furlough for two years with FULL benefits...medical, dental, travel, and seniority accrual.... Before bankruptcy I was able to have the luxury of 20 days off per month and attend school 5 days a week...with full pay and bennies. I am not saying that the past few years have been easy, it HAS been painful, but even with two rounds of givebacks, when I return to the line in August, I will be stepping into a job that pays between 40 and 45k per year. For me, it's still workable.

You are confused. Your union, not the company, got you those opportunities.
 
JAMAKE1 said:
Before bankruptcy I was able to have the luxury of 20 days off per month and attend school 5 days a week...with full pay and bennies. I am not saying that the past few years have been easy, it HAS been painful, but even with two rounds of givebacks, when I return to the line in August, I will be stepping into a job that pays between 40 and 45k per year. For me, it's still workable.

[post="266875"][/post]​

You will NOT be making 40 - 45 k anymore.....sorry to be the informer here. You can get close to that, if you work 20-21 days ON, purser, 110 hours per month and International. Of course, that means you need to be top of payscale, and you aren't there yet.

But, I agree with everything else you said. Just don't be shocked. In your 2 years off, the times have changed.
 
You are confused. Your union, not the company, got you those opportunities.
[post="266884"][/post]​
[/quote]

I am not confused Sastal. I am well aware of that the perks that I enjoyed were the result of years of hard-fought efforts by my union. But I don't share my union's view that United is trying to "screw us." Tilton and his crew are merely trying to get the company out of bankruptcy.

It's not rocket science. If the $6 billion pension liability doesn't get resolved, there's no exit financing for the company to emerge from Chapter 11. The alternative is Chapter 7.

That's the reality. I am not saying I agree with it and that I like it, but I believe it is better to MINIMIZE one's losses, rather than throwing the baby out with the bath water.
 
JAMAKE1 said:
Sastal:

Tilton accepted a pay cut the moment he agreed to come to United. It is not up to you to determine whether or not Tilton has failed in his job at UAL...it is up to the BOD.
[post="266883"][/post]​

Obviously, you haven’t used your time in school effectively to learn how to interpret financial statements and assess the general financial position of a corporation. Why don’t you use your ample days off to give the company’s annual reports a quick glance? It doesn’t take someone on the BOD to figure that out.
 
Fly said:
You will NOT be making 40 - 45 k anymore.....sorry to be the informer here. You can get close to that, if you work 20-21 days ON, purser, 110 hours per month and International. Of course, that means you need to be top of payscale, and you aren't there yet.

But, I agree with everything else you said. Just don't be shocked. In your 2 years off, the times have changed.
[post="266888"][/post]​

Thanks for the heads-up Fly, but I have spoken with 4 of my colleagues who happen to be junior or equal to me in seniority and all of them grossed 40K in 2004, not counting per diem. I realize that a second concessionary agreement is now in effect, so 2005 could be worse, but I am based in SFO and happen to be Purser Qualified, so between the two, hopefully the latest round of givebacks will be minimized by the ability to fly international and Purser.
 
whatkindoffreshhell said:
So let Tilton leave!! How on earth can you defend his pathetic record?

You missed my point -- there are several inside UA candidates who truly could lead the company. For a lot less.

Tilton is a faceless bureaucrat. I suppose you thought Leo Mullin was valuable to DL too???
[post="266868"][/post]​
I'm not trying to "defend" anyone. I am just pointing out the realities of the labor market. Tilton and Mullin are / were valued by their employers more for his services more than you are for yours. Deal with it, or start down a career path that will make you more valuable in the labor market and end up with you being the CEO of a major company and enjoy the perks that come along with it.

I will leave the sniping about whether Tilton has done a good job as CEO or not to others. Although I will point out that many front line employees will never, ever, admit a CEO is doing a decent job, no matter who it is. So it will end up being a pointless debate that I won't participate in.
 
Sastal:

Just because a business plan hasn't been made public or that United is continuing to hemmorage money does not mean that the leadership team is not doing its job. Look at the environment in which United is operating under. What legacy carrier ISN'T hemmoraging?

And there's no need to hurl insults my way, just because I don't agree that Tilton is out to "screw" me.
 
" I will point out that many front line employees will never, ever, admit a CEO is doing a decent job, no matter who it is".


Well said Bear, it's known as "class envy."

Over n out...
 
sastal said:
Exactly. Bear obviously thinks CEOs should not lead by example by taking a paycut while everyone else does, even if their cut does not save the company. Tilton has had plenty of time to do what he was supposed to do, and he has failed. It's interesting to see people like Jetz, Drvr, and Bear continue to support him despite his miserable performance. I guess some people are just mesmerized by figures of authority.
[post="266879"][/post]​
As I just said, I am not going to get into the "Tilton failed" debate (except to point out that just the fact that UA is still here, relatively intact, would count as success in many people's books -- those that count, anyways, meaning not the disgruntled employee masses who will complain no matter what).

"Should" a CEO lead by example? Sure; that'd be swell, if it makes you feel warm and fuzzy. That type of cheerleading stuff doesn't matter to me. Frankly, I'd rather have a CEO concentrate on doing the hard work behind the scenes and skipping the photo-ops and PR stunts. But hey that's just me.

I neither "support" nor "oppose" Tilton. While I was at UA, he was my CEO (one of many). I felt no particular loyalty nor hostility towards him, or Goodwin, or Greenwald, or the others. (Nor was I "mesmerized" by them.) They did their jobs; I did mine. Ho hum. It wasn't worth getting whipped into a frenzy because someone was making more money than me.

Also I realize I -- along with everyone else here -- am supremely unqualified to judge the job Tilton has been doing. I don't have all the information necessary to evaluate that. (Neither do you, by the way, though you may think you do.) Sure, there is the union rhetoric about how evil / greedy / etc. he is, and how he can't manage his way out of a paper bag, etc., if you want to buy into all that. (Although sometimes I worry that the UA unions don't really have a grip on reality.)

On the other hand, although I didn't agree with EVERY decision WHQ made (and if you are looking for that in your CEO, you are going to be sadly disappointed your whole working life), I balanced the rhetoric with the fact that my paychecks never bounced; I was provided with a safe workplace in what can be a dangerous setting at 35,000'; and I was treated as well there as I was in other places I have worked.

In the end, I decided I was no longer willing to work at this job for what UA was willing to pay me. So instead of giving myself heartburn over every perceived slight by evil greedy management for the rest of my career, I just left and found something that more than adequately compensates me.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #28
Bear96 said:
In the end, I decided I was no longer willing to work at this job for what UA was willing to pay me. So instead of giving myself heartburn over every perceived slight by evil greedy management for the rest of my career, I just left and found something that more than adequately compensates me.
[post="266898"][/post]​
A pity you can't stop looking back.
 
I still have friends here, and the airline industry is a fascinating one, especially with what is going on now.

So I'll be sticking around here for a while.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top