Oldweirdharold
Member
- Nov 27, 2003
- 55
- 0
To all,
Sorry to rehash a topic but I have a question if I may..
In reading the LM2 from 514 I too noticed the inordinate amount of pay for certain individuals and questioned this..
I was told the report covered multiple years hence the inflated figures but later I noticed upon closer examination that in order for this to be the case the LM2 in question would actually be an ammended document and the upper left corner ammended is not checked, Why is this???
Also the time period would consist of multiple years which is does not, look at this also along top of form...
A dumb ol' country boy like me just needs to have this explained to him if you have the time and I'll surely thank you in advance..
Jim Anderson 4D Tule
Sorry to rehash a topic but I have a question if I may..
In reading the LM2 from 514 I too noticed the inordinate amount of pay for certain individuals and questioned this..
I was told the report covered multiple years hence the inflated figures but later I noticed upon closer examination that in order for this to be the case the LM2 in question would actually be an ammended document and the upper left corner ammended is not checked, Why is this???
Also the time period would consist of multiple years which is does not, look at this also along top of form...
A dumb ol' country boy like me just needs to have this explained to him if you have the time and I'll surely thank you in advance..
Jim Anderson 4D Tule