- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #31
Because maybe he views it as better that some jobs survive than no jobs survive? It's a reasonable view. The choice here is between everyone losing their job and some people losing their job (or part of their pay).
It's doubtful Bronner wanted to pay Siegel and Cohen what they got. No, it's not fair. They did a poor job and were rewarded for it. But nothing can be done about it now. So you want to kill US Airways in protest? A worse-than-empty gesture that won't trouble Siegel and Cohen in the slightest?
They say the best revenge is living well. That seems a laughable prospect at this stage. But in many ways, the best revenge against Siegel and Cohen would be to turn this sucker around and make it fly. People would note that you succeeded where they failed--and that would make them look bad.
Siegel's reputation has already suffered damage. But right now he's probably rooting for the company to self-immolate, because then he can say "see, it wasn't my fault, the unions and the employees were nuts".
It's doubtful Bronner wanted to pay Siegel and Cohen what they got. No, it's not fair. They did a poor job and were rewarded for it. But nothing can be done about it now. So you want to kill US Airways in protest? A worse-than-empty gesture that won't trouble Siegel and Cohen in the slightest?
They say the best revenge is living well. That seems a laughable prospect at this stage. But in many ways, the best revenge against Siegel and Cohen would be to turn this sucker around and make it fly. People would note that you succeeded where they failed--and that would make them look bad.
Siegel's reputation has already suffered damage. But right now he's probably rooting for the company to self-immolate, because then he can say "see, it wasn't my fault, the unions and the employees were nuts".
Trin03 said:Why would any decent human being with even a once of compassion ask employees to basically swallow the bitter pill and live in poverty with their families? I take offense to the fact that he wants decent hardworking people to Not put their kids through college, to NOT be able to afford to clothe and feed themselves and families and to live at the poverty line OR below it to save a company that has consistently allowed upper management to "rape" the pockets of those they serve?
[post="170716"][/post]