Some would call it a waste of time.
Others would call it due diligence and trying to make the unions accountable to the membership with an actual membership vote on representation.
Whoever is at the table in negotiations would have a far stronger hand to play if they had a full membership vote behind their representation.
As to the shift rotation, where do they still do that? AFW is no more.
Others would call it due diligence and trying to make the unions accountable to the membership with an actual membership vote on representation.
Whoever is at the table in negotiations would have a far stronger hand to play if they had a full membership vote behind their representation.
As to the shift rotation, where do they still do that? AFW is no more.