local 12 proud
Veteran
- Mar 5, 2004
- 4,265
- 4
I am not arguing as you suggest; I simply wanted a clarification from LOCAL.
I think I'll just let you remain confounded by it all!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am not arguing as you suggest; I simply wanted a clarification from LOCAL.
I think I'll just let you remain confounded by it all!
Fair enough.
What did you think about Giuliani's remarks about Iran today? Can't say we don't know where he stands.
irregardless of your self diss and your guys stupid argument this has now become the dumbest topic ever including this post
wow, UAL_tiff, you can use wikipedia.
oops wait, you misquote it:
irregardless of your self diss and your guys stupid argument this has now become the dumbest topic ever including this post
Bush still hopes to isolate Iran diplomatically, but believes the regime is moving steadily closer to obtaining nuclear weapons while the security council bickers.
General John Abizaid, the former Centcom commander, said last week: “Every effort should be made to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, but failing that, the world could live with a nuclear-armed Iran.â€
Critics fear Abizaid has lost sight of Iran’s potential to arm militant groups such as Hezbollah with nuclear weapons. “You can deter Iran, but there is no strategy against nuclear terrorism,†said the retired air force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney of the Iran policy committee.
“There is no question that we can take out Iran. The problem is the follow-on, the velvet revolution that needs to be created so the Iranian people know it’s not aimed at them, but at the Iranian regime.â€
The survey - conducted jointly at the end of July by the Simons Foundation and Angus Reid Strategies - was answered by adults in six countries and showed that 37% of Israelis believed the use of nuclear weapons to prevent a war would be justified, while 35% believed the weapons could be justifiably used during a war.
As far as I am concerned, attacking Iran will be about as successful as invading Iraq was.
Despite its usual posturing about its military excellence and that of its terrorist allies, Iran appears to be increasingly concerned about Syria’s ability to detect infiltration by Israeli aircraft, an issue that may affect its own ability to protect itself from the IAF.
A report on the U.S.-based Aviation Week website this week said Israel’s covert IAF attack on a Syrian military installation last month shook Iranian confidence in the country’s Russian-manufactured radar and air defense systems.
The idea that the US can just fly over Iran, drop a few well placed bombs and go home for dinner seems quite simplistic. Do you have any example in history where that has worked?
If you bomb Iran and leave the government in place, you think there will not be consequences?
Yes...internal revolution-it is already reported Iranian populace is not leaning the way the gov't is
The idea that the US can just fly over Iran, drop a few well placed bombs and go home for dinner seems quite simplistic. Do you have any example in history where that has worked?
Yes....Hiroshima and Nagisaki