Its Iran

  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #35
wow, UAL_tiff, you can use wikipedia.

oops wait, you misquote it:



irregardless of your self diss and your guys stupid argument this has now become the dumbest topic ever including this post

You made that remark on another thread..

Keep it on the gay thread sweetie...er I mean smitty....
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #36
Its a Bingo

Bush still hopes to isolate Iran diplomatically, but believes the regime is moving steadily closer to obtaining nuclear weapons while the security council bickers.

Wow....just like before Iraq.

General John Abizaid, the former Centcom commander, said last week: “Every effort should be made to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, but failing that, the world could live with a nuclear-armed Iran.â€￾

Critics fear Abizaid has lost sight of Iran’s potential to arm militant groups such as Hezbollah with nuclear weapons. “You can deter Iran, but there is no strategy against nuclear terrorism,â€￾ said the retired air force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney of the Iran policy committee.

“There is no question that we can take out Iran. The problem is the follow-on, the velvet revolution that needs to be created so the Iranian people know it’s not aimed at them, but at the Iranian regime.â€￾
 
Article


The survey - conducted jointly at the end of July by the Simons Foundation and Angus Reid Strategies - was answered by adults in six countries and showed that 37% of Israelis believed the use of nuclear weapons to prevent a war would be justified, while 35% believed the weapons could be justifiably used during a war.
 
As far as I am concerned, attacking Iran will be about as successful as invading Iraq was.

Who said anything about Invading?

Looks like the IAF has out smarted those pesky Russian made air defenses and seems the Iranians talking Smack about wiping Israel off the map just may get Iran b!tch slapped!!! :lol:

Despite its usual posturing about its military excellence and that of its terrorist allies, Iran appears to be increasingly concerned about Syria’s ability to detect infiltration by Israeli aircraft, an issue that may affect its own ability to protect itself from the IAF.

A report on the U.S.-based Aviation Week website this week said Israel’s covert IAF attack on a Syrian military installation last month shook Iranian confidence in the country’s Russian-manufactured radar and air defense systems.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/123832
 
If you bomb Iran and leave the government in place, you think there will not be consequences? Now if you plan on taking out the government and not have boots on the ground you will end up with Iraq since there will be a power vacuum and a blood bath will ensue in which case the end result might end up being even worse than what you have now.

The idea that the US can just fly over Iran, drop a few well placed bombs and go home for dinner seems quite simplistic. Do you have any example in history where that has worked?
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #45
If you bomb Iran and leave the government in place, you think there will not be consequences?

Yes...internal revolution-it is already reported Iranian populace is not leaning the way the gov't is

The idea that the US can just fly over Iran, drop a few well placed bombs and go home for dinner seems quite simplistic. Do you have any example in history where that has worked?

Yes....Hiroshima and Nagisaki

Made in America....tested in Japan
 

Latest posts

Back
Top