Dont call me Shirley
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 3,270
- 306
There have been a number of instances wherein the CEO of a distressed company agrees to work for a $1.00 a year until the company recovers...perhaps the most well known case is Lee Iacoca of Chrysler around 1979-82.
If our CEO were to cut his pay like this (let's say he keeps his signing bonus and pay up until now) would you see this as merely a symbolic gesture or an example of "shared sacrifice"?
Granted, CEOs who do this are still able to live well: Mr Iacoca did not have to sell his mansion in Grosse Pointe (or where ever he lives) and move to a garden appartment in a distressed section of Detroit. Or give up a limo for a '79 Chrysler compact (now that truly would have been a sacrifice ) But, as I recall, it was taken by many in labor, business, and government as more than an empty gesture. And did help, if only in a small way, Chrysler to recover. (So did the rest of his PR campaign).
I think the CEO (I cant remember his name and don't feel like doing a Google search) of Moulden Mills, the textile company. did the same thing after their plant burned down.
If Dave were to do the same, would you see it as more than a symbolic gesture?
Or mere window dressing?
Yes, the man is wealthy, but 750K is not chicken feed. I would like to think that such a move would help to better some of the very negative atmosphere that we have seen. The money saved would not make a difference, nor would it help an expressed agent or reserve F/A to pay the bills. But it would give some meaning to "shared sacrifice". And give some PR value.
Let the flames begin!
If our CEO were to cut his pay like this (let's say he keeps his signing bonus and pay up until now) would you see this as merely a symbolic gesture or an example of "shared sacrifice"?
Granted, CEOs who do this are still able to live well: Mr Iacoca did not have to sell his mansion in Grosse Pointe (or where ever he lives) and move to a garden appartment in a distressed section of Detroit. Or give up a limo for a '79 Chrysler compact (now that truly would have been a sacrifice ) But, as I recall, it was taken by many in labor, business, and government as more than an empty gesture. And did help, if only in a small way, Chrysler to recover. (So did the rest of his PR campaign).
I think the CEO (I cant remember his name and don't feel like doing a Google search) of Moulden Mills, the textile company. did the same thing after their plant burned down.
If Dave were to do the same, would you see it as more than a symbolic gesture?
Or mere window dressing?
Yes, the man is wealthy, but 750K is not chicken feed. I would like to think that such a move would help to better some of the very negative atmosphere that we have seen. The money saved would not make a difference, nor would it help an expressed agent or reserve F/A to pay the bills. But it would give some meaning to "shared sacrifice". And give some PR value.
Let the flames begin!