PSA1979
Senior
- Jan 15, 2003
- 360
- 6
nycbusdriver said:Could there also be the motive that a movie rolling means less demand on the F/A staff? Of course, NO ONE HERE would hever have that motive.
[post="275562"][/post]
BUSTED!!!!!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nycbusdriver said:Could there also be the motive that a movie rolling means less demand on the F/A staff? Of course, NO ONE HERE would hever have that motive.
[post="275562"][/post]
Aryeh said:Flight schedules/fleet use to/from hubs is already out of out of whack!
The most obvious misallocation of assets has been going on for years. Worse to come?
Doesn't anyone ever notice the US flight schedule's typical pattern:
The contrast on one hand of flights operating between the west coast and hubs, and on the other hand the flights operating between the hubs and the rest of the system.
Flights to/from the west coast have, in comparison, have less frequency and far more passengers than the non-westcoast flights. It's the norm for a passenger to fly LAX to PIT/PHL/CLT on a flight that is full, only to connect onward to SYR, BOS, DCA, ATL, etc., etc. and find the connecting flight near empty.
Time and again, try to get a seat assigned in advance, if you're lucky maybe a center seat to/from LAX or SFO whereas the flight to an eastern city has window or aisles available.
And this is true with flight availability and booking codes. Flight to/from west coast often if open, only Y or B class is possible. However the system's eastern portion often has all classes open, even X.
I've never understood this, so obvious, misallocation of a fleet. Since most travelers seek and travel with fares booked in classes other than Y or B, if K, L class is open just to/from PHL and JAX, but sold out to SFO, the passenger will go elsewhere and not fly on either of these flights.
This problem has only been worsened by further reductions on one half of the equation.
[post="275710"][/post]
Ah yes, the yield thing! Flights to the west coast are low-yield, they say. Hmm, a passenger flies on a full flight to CLT, then connects to a mainline flight to PHL with thirty people on it? Which flight has the lower yield? And this isn't the exception but fairly typical, day to day thing. Something tells me that the west coast low-yield argument is just a way to excuse their own ineptitude. Eastern markets aren't high yield if the flights are empty. And which region of the route system features GO Fares? Or is which markets is US competing with WN and others? Not the west coast markets.JS said:Ah, but you are missing CCY's point of view ... flights to the West Coast are low-yield, so cut them. Never mind that it decimates the value of the overall network. Cut, cut, cut, that will save the day!
[post="275718"][/post]