What's new

Gen. Patraeus

There's truth in those quotes and truth in Veritas. Thanks very much for the quotes as they do indeed speak to the essence of our nation.

But you do not isolate patriotism as a single attribute of citizenship -- and remember citizenship is a right confered upon the individual which carries both promises/guarantees and obligations. Patriotism is similar to parenting. It involves love, devotion, and trust and it sometimes requires tough decisions and dissent ( tough love?), as well as patience and humility.

But you wield patriotism here more like a cudgel. And your cudgel is based upon a (false) assumption that your view or interpretation of the President and his policies is the "right" or "correct" view. Actually, this is quite understandable when one feel passionately and strongly about their own world view.

The reality is that the world is bigger than all of us. Certainly Mr. Bush has gotten his come uppance when Iraq does not kow tow to democracy or to American force. Taken in isolation, this appears to be an abject failure. Taken in the context of the world, it's an event taken a bad turn as human beings struggle to move forward. Mr. Bush does not lack compassion or a desire to do right. He does lack the capacity to click his heels and wish his way back to the good old days -- but so too do all of us. And the world and its dangers is not static while we argue microscopically about Iraq or a flawed president.

Our citizenship or patriotism as you call it, requires much of each of us as well. Dissent is the easy part. Wisdom is the elusive element which can help both presidents and individuals to find the less dangerous path. Humility teaches all of us that we all err and stumble and that there are times when you step aside and aver helping and there are times when you lend a reluctant hand not to help an individual you dislike, but to act in a sense of family, comminuty and nation. This act does not require any of us to disavow our beliefs, but it does stengthen our relationships. This is a much stronger and more enduring form of patriotism/citizenship.

I don't see the Iraq situation or terrorism or anything else in terms of black and white or right and wrong. President Bsuh has f*cked up big time, but so too has he tried to act for the good of others. He's not the evil man or innate jackass that some folks say. Neither is he an historic leader and man of limitless wisdom. One reason that this Iraq debate has become so foul, so ugly, and so poliltically rancid is becasue each of us has allowed it become so.

That politicians take short cuts with facts, policy, and actions is part and parcel of the political creature. That the media takes the breadth of facts and distills them into sound bytes and snippets of cliche and hyperbole which distort and seperate real facts from the larger world around them is disturbing. That citizens for the most part do not question this process and fall into convenient camps of us versus them (the "us" camp is always the "correct" camp of course) without first asking what the real facts are weakens the matrix of the nation.

Everyone is so busy pushing their own "My Space" version of reality and what is wrong or right with the President or this or that policy that no one is pausing to listen to others around them and in the process, to feel the pulse of reality. If we did so, we would each concede ground as this Iraq situation remains ugly and dangerous and the nation as a whole must move towards a consensus which is built upon realism and not acrimony and a "majority rules" mentality ( didn't work in the 1950s South and won't work in today's larger world ). Life is not a game of winner take all. It's about getting your act together and trying to face the next day ( and the troubles/hopes/dangers it holds ). This country is so splintered at the moment by abject acrimony on both sides that no one is prepared to face the future. Has anyone considered chilling and simply supporting our troops plain sans condionalisms or insults? It's serious stuff, and the sooner we admit such, the sooner politicos and the media will have to pause to listen to the silence. An election looms which requires decisions of substance, not interest-group-driven revenge and excess.

Stepping down from soap box.

AMF

Barry
 
Jersey,

Trust and respect are earned. Everything W touches turns to lead. He has cried wolf so many times, that he is no longer trusted. Members of his own party do not trust him, not a single candidate running for office has had him speak on their behalf. Your party is disintegrating and you are worried about.

GF

Veritis touches upon the idea of patriotism and citizenship and I offer my own view/interpretaion in the above response. Consider the idea of what citizenship means. It's not about me versus you dude.

Barry
 
I am getting so tired of people playing this patriotism card like it is the holy grail. “Support the troopsâ€, “Support the presidencyâ€â€¦ blah blah.

Support? Why the hell does the government not support the troops? Why do they not have adequate equipment? When if we are fighting a “world war†on terror is there not a draft? Why did W wait 4 years to start a surge when his generals told him that he did not have enough troops to start out with? Why are they not getting the medical care they need? Why are soldiers who are in shock and unable to perform 100% given a few aspirin and sent back on the line? Why is this lack of patriotism not being questioned?

Nah. The government would rather waste money on high dollar weapon systems which will not help the troops on the ground survive an IED. There is no draft because as soon as ‘Daddy Warbucks†kid has to join up and get his ass shot off, this crap would end really quick. W did not listen to his generals because he is an arrogant SOB who ‘stands by his people’ even though he/they are dead wrong. I just love how surge comes after the republicans got their butts handed to them at election time.

No, dissent is not the easy part, especially in this day and age and with people such as your self. The “decider†is the one who started questioning people patriotism when he said you are either with us or against us. My guess would be that is also the reason why an unknown number of Congress people voted for the war. This country wanted blood. They did not care who’s blood, they just wanted revenge. Unfortunately we did not have a leader in place who told people to sit down, shut up and wait to find out who was at fault. OBL. Afghanistan and the Taliban were linked to it and we went after them. Goody. All is good. Well not really. We could not find OBL so we needed to kick someone else’s butt. We also needed a country where we could establish military bases from which to protect our oil. Who is the weakest one there? Can’t really take over Kuait after we rescued them. OH wait, I have an idea. Let’s get Iraq. No one likes them and he is a real PIA. No worries. It will be a cake walk. Rummy is in charge and all will be good. Who had the balls to stand up against them? No one because it would not have been patriotic. You can take your patriotism and stick it. I have no interest in it.

Bush may not lack the desire to be compassionate or the desire to do what is right, he is just to bloody stupid to know what it is or surround him self with people who have the ability to give him good advise. Then again, I have long been of the opinion that he is merely the puppet and Darth Vader (and a few others) have been the puppet master.

I have yet to understand why Clinton gets impeached for lying to a GJ about getting a hummer on the Oval but Scooter lies and gets convicted by a jury yet he gets pardoned. W has lied to the people so many times no one believes a word he says any more and he is just going about his day like nothing happened.

The Middle East has been a power keg for decades if not longer. All it needed was for someone to light the fuse and off she goes. Bush lit the fuse with is invasion of Iraq. If gave Syria and Iran a way to put their foot in the door. It has drained our military of precious resources (over 3,600 at last count). It has wasted over $500 billion and still counting. The ramifications of his actions will be felt for decades if not longer. A possible conflict with Iran? What happens when someone does the unthinkable? Dirty bomb? Nuke? If ever a time called for diplomacy, 2001 was it. I think a real statesman could have had a chance to bring a good part of the world together and take meaningful action. But alas that opportunity is long gone.
 
Good for you. It's too bad that from 1992 thru 2000, the right wing couldn't do that much. We are supposed to respect the occupant of the Oval Office. But just like a kid watching their parents smoke tends to take up smoking, the dems watched their predecessors not only disrespect, but SLANDER the occupant of the oval office. So can we blame them for lacking a little respect for a president who:

1. Sent troops to war because of WMD's and then made jokes (looking under chairs) saying "they gotta be around here somewhere"

or

2. Sits in the Oval Office and urges the enemy to "Bring 'em on". Sorry...crap like that doesn't tend to make me want to respect that man.

What if anything made you respect "other" presidents then? :lol:

The Dem's set the standard and you know it.
 
What about the standard Nixon set?

Clinton committed perjury in a case about sex in the Oval. Nixon authorized a B&E. I say that B&E beats a BJ. Bush has lied about Iraq, has done a 2 step with OBL, has pardoned a person who lied to Congress and was convicted of such. All this and you want to say that Clinton is the standard bearer for all that is evil in politics?

It cracks me up when people talk about respect and politicians in the same breath. They are right up there with car sales people and snake oil sales people.
 
What about the standard Nixon set?

Clinton committed perjury in a case about sex in the Oval. Nixon authorized a B&E. I say that B&E beats a BJ. Bush has lied about Iraq, has done a 2 step with OBL, has pardoned a person who lied to Congress and was convicted of such. All this and you want to say that Clinton is the standard bearer for all that is evil in politics?

It cracks me up when people talk about respect and politicians in the same breath. They are right up there with car sales people and snake oil sales people.

Wasn't aware you peddle snake oil.

Besides,who said anything about Clinton? Guilty conscience?

Nixon did the right thing and resigned.

Vince Foster,FBI files,Rose law firm,to name only a few minor transgressions....Nixon?? :lol:

1992-2000 and the Republicans were such dirty dogs for dissing BJ Clinton....

Why you always using Neo-Con's as a benchmark?
 
Warner most definitely voted in favor of the war. The roll call vote list is here.

Gen Petraeus' job is not to determine if what he is doing is making America safer. He is executing the orders from the Commander in Chief. The problem with Petraeus is that he inserted himself in the political process by writing this op-ed piece in the Washington Post three years ago. It is a must-read. Read his assessment then and compare it to his testimony now.

"Progress has also been made in police training. In the past week alone, some 1,100 graduated from the basic policing course and five specialty courses. By early spring, nine academies in Iraq and one in Jordan will be graduating a total of 5,000 police each month from the eight-week course, which stresses patrolling and investigative skills, substantive and procedural legal knowledge, and proper use of force and weaponry, as well as pride in the profession and adherence to the police code of conduct." (Now the idea of completely dismantling the Iraqi police force is being floated because they are completely infiltrated with militia members)

Since when does a General write an op-ed piece trying to justify to the American people what he is doing? I'll tell you when...when he is ordered to by the Commander-in-Chief. He has now become a political pawn in this game.
 
Wasn't aware you peddle snake oil.

Besides,who said anything about Clinton? Guilty conscience?

Nixon did the right thing and resigned.

Vince Foster,FBI files,Rose law firm,to name only a few minor transgressions....Nixon?? :lol:

1992-2000 and the Republicans were such dirty dogs for dissing BJ Clinton....

Why you always using Neo-Con's as a benchmark?


He resigned because he did not have a choice.

Who was convicted or even indited on the above cases? Foster is a red herring. As for the FBI files someone should have been in jail for that one from what I have read. There was no conviction or incitement on the Rose affair.

I do not 'always' use conservatives as a benchmark. I was merely responding in kind to your generalization that the dems set some sort of bench mark on all that is wrong in politics.

I do not know that they were 'dirty dogs' but they sure are paying the price for their hypocrisies. Gingrich was banging his mistress while railing against Clinton. Craig, Foley to mention a few other family value oriented folks. I guess if you are going to preach family values, you at least ought to walk the talk.
 
He resigned because he did not have a choice.

Who was convicted or even indited on the above cases? Foster is a red herring. As for the FBI files someone should have been in jail for that one from what I have read. There was no conviction or incitement on the Rose affair.

I do not 'always' use conservatives as a benchmark. I was merely responding in kind to your generalization that the dems set some sort of bench mark on all that is wrong in politics.

I do not know that they were 'dirty dogs' but they sure are paying the price for their hypocrisies. Gingrich was banging his mistress while railing against Clinton. Craig, Foley to mention a few other family value oriented folks. I guess if you are going to preach family values, you at least ought to walk the talk.


Funny...those sexual escapades you bring up are SOP in Europe and they laugh at our prudism.
 
That is what made no sense to me when the republicans were going after him. Most of us were thinking it was no big deal. I have always been curious if Hillary stayed with him out of love or if it was because with out him, her political future would not have been as strong. My cynical side tends to believe the latter. It would certainly not be the first marriage of convenience and certainly will not be the last. It leaves me with an uneasy feeling about her. I gues sit does not surprise me, she is a politician and on the whole, they would sell their mother to advance.

SOP in Europe does not make it alright IMO. They are more relaxed sexually but I cannot help but think women do not have the status they do her in the US. Marriage is supposed to mean something. Two people in love and willing to commit their lives together for better or worse. This country treats marriage as a disposable item. Don;t like, try something/someone else. I have had my car for 20 years and my first and only wife for over 5 years. Plan on keeping both till they pass away or I become really really rich and cxan get a trophy wife and trophy car 🙄
 
Marriage is supposed to mean something. Two people in love and willing to commit their lives together for better or worse.

There was a time in this country it did mean something, But alas Moral decay has crept In!

I still Can't help but smile whenever I see an elderly couple walking hand-n-hand.
 
That is what made no sense to me when the republicans were going after him. Most of us were thinking it was no big deal. I have always been curious if Hillary stayed with him out of love or if it was because with out him, her political future would not have been as strong. My cynical side tends to believe the latter. It would certainly not be the first marriage of convenience and certainly will not be the last. It leaves me with an uneasy feeling about her. I gues sit does not surprise me, she is a politician and on the whole, they would sell their mother to advance.

SOP in Europe does not make it alright IMO. They are more relaxed sexually but I cannot help but think women do not have the status they do her in the US. Marriage is supposed to mean something. Two people in love and willing to commit their lives together for better or worse. This country treats marriage as a disposable item. Don;t like, try something/someone else. I have had my car for 20 years and my first and only wife for over 5 years. Plan on keeping both till they pass away or I become really really rich and cxan get a trophy wife and trophy car 🙄

Pol's going after Pol's over sex and money goes to both sides.Its just part of the political game in the USA.Sad each side spends so much time trying to slander and slight the other instead of collectively running our country.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top