RowUnderDCA
Veteran
- Oct 6, 2002
- 2,123
- 1
Isn't this akin to selling all your seniority back to the airline for cash and other benefits?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Travelpro72 said:To clarify, this is to Usairways advantage. If they were to simply offer a vol. furlough, all who took it could come back at the rate of pay they left with. If and only "IF" they need you to come back on a VFLR and you have 20 years you come back as a new hire with the only exception of no probationary period. You lose all seniority and pay. Who in their right mind would do that. Well, the company is banking on that. The fact that they even offer you "Possible" chance later is something not usually heard of. It will be interesting to see who and how many scoot.
[post="253824"][/post]
It's to the company's advantage too that they bring people back at a lower rate fo pay. To answer why they will furlough and bring back at the same time...they will have to pay moving expenses as well to the displaced flight attendants. They will actually get invols to come back that will accept LGA as a base whereas others are more likely to quit and they will eventually have to recall anyway.jimntx said:Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought Vol. furloughs are offered when there is an overage and the company is trying to avoid involuntary furlough of those who wish to stay but are junior. If I am understanding this correctly, US Airways is offering voluntary furloughs and recalling involuntaries (from the thread about the forced transfers to LGA) at the same time????? :huh:
[post="253817"][/post]
jimntx said:Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought Vol. furloughs are offered when there is an overage and the company is trying to avoid involuntary furlough of those who wish to stay but are junior. If I am understanding this correctly, US Airways is offering voluntary furloughs and recalling involuntaries (from the thread about the forced transfers to LGA) at the same time????? :huh:
[post="253817"][/post]
jimntx said:That explains the voluntary furlough side of my question, but on the other thread about the forced transfers to LGA (later rescinded), it was stated by someone (pitbull??) that people on involuntary furlough would be recalled to fill the vacancies at LGA. How can there be too many flight attendants and too few at the same time?
[post="253871"][/post]
Imbalance!! PIT is the only base that is overstaffed presently. The 500 is a result of the 11 737s that we are parking (120) and around 400 coming back in June. That brings us to just about 500. Don't forget, we lose an average of 75-100 flight attendants a month now. I would hate to think the company is finally being proactive instead of reactive....NAHHHHHHHHjimntx said:That explains the voluntary furlough side of my question, but on the other thread about the forced transfers to LGA (later rescinded), it was stated by someone (pitbull??) that people on involuntary furlough would be recalled to fill the vacancies at LGA. How can there be too many flight attendants and too few at the same time?
[post="253871"][/post]