eolesen
Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2003
- Messages
- 15,959
- Reaction score
- 9,374
First off, I assume that anything I write here is monitored, since the search results for this and other forums are regularly picked up by Google.Glenn Quagmire said:Tell us where you want your posts to be monitored then.
The next time you go overseas to any country, we should be able to monitor what you posted on any social media site, just to make sure you didn't get "radicalized".
Second, if you have kids and haven't checked their social media, you're a fool. If you'd do it on your kids, why wouldn't you do it on someone looking to enter the country?
Call it a double standard, but what I do as a citizen is protected from action by the US government, regardless of where that takes place. US Courts have regularly afforded Constitutional protections to anyone inside our borders, including illegals.
What DHS is doing wasn't affecting US citizens or people already inside our border -- they were looking at activity taken by non-citizens outside our borders, none of which would be within the jurisdiction of a US court.
Some of you seem shocked that there are countries who might actually protect their borders and decide who can and can't enter. Apparently you don't travel much.
The UK maintains a list of people banned from entry due to their social media activity. It's the same list radio host Michael Savage wound up on. Australia and Singapore have also denied people visas on similar grounds. Canada still bans people with a DUI.
Last time I checked, all three of those countries were considered first world.