D.O.L. is being asked to investigate

The U.S. Department of Labor is being asked to investigate the circumstance''s as well as the vote itself. Local union officials from Miami will be providing information to help begin an investigation.

The DOL is fimiliar with our organization. Up until the mid 90s our votes were under federal supervision. Due to past irregularites.

The potential for fraud was great. Made worse by the fact that it become common knowldge that with nothing more than a SS number you could get anybodys pin number. Use it to vote if they have not, change the vote if they had.
 
I agree....Ugly....some people will not be happy until AA falls and declares BK
 
----------------
On 4/17/2003 8:10:19 AM FA Mikey wrote:

The U.S. Department of Labor is being asked to investigate the circumstance''s as well as the vote itself. Local union officials from Miami will be providing information to help begin an investigation.

The DOL is fimiliar with our organization. Up until the mid 90s our votes were under federal supervision. Due to past irregularites.

----------------​
Leave it to anybody in South Florida to f**k up a vote.
 
Doesn''t matter anyway as its a done deal! Once your union rep signs the dotted line its legal. Ask the Braniff Int employees. Their Business rep signed an ENTIRE CONTRACT instead of a Back-to-Work agreement without even taking a vote! Court found it to be a violation of IAM rules but it was still a legal document as he was the employee represenative.
 
Maybe, but if a DFR is won then it may open an avenue to void out the represetatives right to sign that document. If fraud is proven then how could the contract be binding? If it never went to a vote thats one thing, it could be said that it was an emergency, but with the 6 year term I cant imagine how any court would uphold such an agreement. It would most certainly lead to disruptions and rebellion.
 
----------------
On 4/17/2003 11:03:39 AM Bob Owens wrote:

Maybe, but if a DFR is won then it may open an avenue to void out the represetatives right to sign that document. If fraud is proven then how could the contract be binding? If it never went to a vote thats one thing, it could be said that it was an emergency, but with the 6 year term I cant imagine how any court would uphold such an agreement. It would most certainly lead to disruptions and rebellion.

----------------​

A rebellion sounds good.

Lily
 
----------------
On 4/17/2003 9:09:33 AM ITRADE wrote:




----------------
On 4/17/2003 8:10:19 AM FA Mikey wrote:

The U.S. Department of Labor is being asked to investigate the circumstance''s as well as the vote itself. Local union officials from Miami will be providing information to help begin an investigation.

The DOL is fimiliar with our organization. Up until the mid 90s our votes were under federal supervision. Due to past irregularites.

----------------​
Leave it to anybody in South Florida to f**k up a vote.

----------------​

Leave it to Texas to demand a recount/extension when the results aren''t in their favor.
 
"Leave it to Texas to demand a recount/extension when the results aren't in their favor""

HA!!! I love that. So true...
By the way Ch.12, union officials in MIA are trying to clean up the colossal mess created by a bunch of dimwits in Texas. Before you go off your handle, I am not saying Texans are dimwits. I'm saying a bunch of dimwits in Texas caused this problems. Floridians had nothing to do with it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top