Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
spacewaitress said:If UAL's 'summer of 2000' is any indicator, yes, I do think USAir will be able to survive this. The low low fares have created a market that hasn't been there in the past...just take a look at who's flying these days.
[post="232337"][/post]
FM2436 said:http://www.aviationplanning.com/asrc1.htm
This "Seth" program makes US Airways look like a pack of amateurs just out of a Third World marketing class. It actually has some creature dressed (if you can call it that) like a punk rocker, complete with a spiked, orange-dyed hairdo and a Zoot Suit. Then they have this ambassador of bad taste run around Florida hyping US Airways in nursing homes (!) and shopping malls. If employees have little respect for management, it's examples of this type of amateur voodoo-marketing that causes it.
© 2004, The Boyd Group/ASRC, Inc. All Rights Reserved
[post="232235"][/post]
GadgetFreak said:It caused a huge amount of personal stress and misery and it is probably true to say had a substantial negative impact on my life for years.[post="233040"][/post]
Winglet said:Geez. You need some serious therapy if a lost bag and a weather delay had a "substantial negative impact" on your life for "years." Why don't you sue the airlines and governement for your incredible pain and suffering? What's rush hour traffic do for ya?
Pal, you need to go live in some places in the world where people are worried about where their next meal is coming from or if someone is going to put a bullet in their brain in the near future. Maybe then you can get a reality check on your life and stop your petty whining.
[post="233067"][/post]
Not sure where you went to school - 700UW, but your math skills or lack thereof SUCK!!700UW said:80 people out of 10,000, sorry jack that ain't gonna happen, it was not a union sanctioned job action.
You people want greyhound fares and QE2 service, you can't have both, it is catching up now.
[post="232501"][/post]
And, Southwest ALWAYS gets you there and generally ON TIME!!GadgetFreak said:I think that the majority of passengers that were badly effected by this will not fly US again and cutting fares wont matter much at all. There are a couple reasons why I think this is true.
1) If you would ask 100 people that fly Southwest why they chose Southwest over US I would guess 80 or 90 of them would say that it is because they are treated better by the employees. People like that will not be flying US is they were involved in this.
2) Many people who werent involved in this saw the pictures and wont buy a ticket on US at any price as a result. They dont want to take the risk of sleeping in the airport.
3) Given the way I, and I think many others make decisions about airlines, I dont look at EVERY airline, but a few that I like for whatever reason. People like that wont even see that US has cheaper prices given that type of decision making.
4) It is arguable (and has been explained as being this way by more than one UA employee) that the US summer of hell was the single most damaging thing to UA that resulted in their Ch11. While AA and others were building up cash pre Sept 11, UA was still trying to recover from the summer of hell and the lost revenue that summer and in subsequent months as a lot of flyers no longer flew UA. Whether they recover is yet unknown, but it hurt them very badly and US cant survive that kind of a loss at this point in time.
In my case I had a similar Christmas experience with AA. It was largely weather induced, much more than in this case with US. But I thought that AA handled it very badly, gave wrong information, lost our bags for days, etc. It caused a huge amount of personal stress and misery and it is probably true to say had a substantial negative impact on my life for years. Basically it great exacerbated the whole Christmas tension thing to an intolerable point that one year. So I promised myself I wouldnt fly AA again. I broke the promise a few times, maybe 5 or at the outside 10. It I couldnt fly on anyone else or for a few other reasons. Maybe once or twice over cost but Im not sure about that. If it was cost it wouldnt have been a few dollars. Maybe a few hundred but Im not even sure about that. I finally started flying AA again in 2003. I had for years been flying 200,000 miles per year or more on other carriers. But I figured since the original incident was in 1982 the people involved had probably retired so I could fly AA again. I think Im not too atypical A very sizable number of these customers wont be back; ever, at any price.
I really want US to survive. And I am trying to work up the courage to buy some tickets on them for January. But it is tough. I am afraid it is very likely that these couple hundred employees have ended it. I dont see a recovery from this point. And I dont think it will be long to see it. Basically US was counting on the profits from the holidays to provide the cash to last until summer (coupled with the employee concessions). This disruption and the combination of costs to repair it (baggage deliver, etc) and the lost revenue due to it in this coming winter seem to be nonrecoverable to me. I hope Im wrong and everyone gets to give me a nasty "I told you so".
[post="233040"][/post]
Your knowledge of how many IAM members at US Airways -SUCK!balloonguy said:Not sure where you went to school - 700UW, but your math skills or lack thereof SUCK!!
[post="233105"][/post]
PITbull said:Roach,
AFA sick calls were less than 10 from last xmas eve's numbers, and also xmas day. Today, was 40 higher, but NO cancellations.
Go figure.
If the number of sick calls from last year to this year are basically the same in total, (and last year there were no crew cancellations) then mangment failed to consider the attrition rate for 2004 and put this in the equation of holiday coverage, or lack there of. I don't expect the company to "recall" f/as for 4 days of the year, however, giving incentives that they can pay out months later (which was suggested last year), would maybe have cut the losses, consumer confidence spiral even by 30%, that would have been successful.
That just didn't happen, and I call this poor planning.
But blaming this on labor is typical. I know the figures from last year, as I had written them down. And I made it my business to call c/s to get the numbers for this holiday.
Blaming this on the rank in file, is just a managment excuse who didn't plan well.
Nonetheless, pointing fingers will not change consumer confidence. And this company has to find a solution with labor together, or shut the lights.
[post="232506"][/post]
Are you sure this guy isn't Johnny Rotten of the Sex Pistols?RWerksman said:
Everytime I see this picture it reminds me of a time in college where some dude (who ironically looked somewhat this guy) asked me to, "go shoot up" with him.
Seriously, who picked this retarded marketing concept?
[post="233003"][/post]
Hey why don't use your screen name?UseYourHead said:PitBull,
The judge will consider this, the creditors, your neighbors, etc. They look at this group as a bunch of spoiled whiners, and they are right!
Shame on you for any attempt to justify this crap!
[post="233162"][/post]
GadgetFreak said:I think that the majority of passengers that were badly effected by this will not fly US again and cutting fares wont matter much at all. There are a couple reasons why I think this is true....
[post="233040"][/post]
FM2436 said:Are you sure this guy isn't Johnny Rotten of the Sex Pistols?
[post="233167"][/post]