Back And Fort He Goes

Meanwhile, in George W. Bush's America:

http://www.startribune.com/stories/357/4925396.html


Nick Coleman: Hearing Bush took some doing
Nick Coleman, Star Tribune
August 13, 2004 NICK0813



The president was visiting Mankato and Tim Walz wanted to see him. A teacher who has 23 years of service in the National Guard and who recently returned home from overseas, Walz wanted to hear his commander-in-chief.

He did.

But only after being threatened with arrest and subjected to a political interrogation. Welcome home, good and faithful soldier. You may see the president.

But keep your mouth shut.

(Intolerance is nonpartisan, so I make a standing offer to President Bush backers: If you are quashed by Democrats, I will report it.)

Walz, 40, supports John Kerry. But you don't need to know what Walz believes, and neither did the Bush campaign workers who interrogated him when he went to see the president speak in a Mankato quarry on Aug. 4.

The Bush visit was a huge event in Mankato, which had not hosted a president since Harry Truman. Walz got a ticket without trouble, but others were refused because they didn't seem rah-rah enough, including two teens rejected because they were baby Democrats.

One of the kids had his mom get tickets for the boys, in their names. The mom asked Walz to chaperone the boys. But the kids would not get to see the president.

Only supporters got into the quarry where Bush spoke to a sanitized crowd of 7,000. Not one person carried a sign in protest. But one -- one -- listened without applauding. It was Walz, and his thoughts were his own, unless someone was scanning his brain.

"It was uncomfortable," says Walz, who joined the Guard at 17 and teaches geography at Mankato West High School. "Where else in America will you find 7,000 people who agree on anything?"

Walz is a first sergeant in the 125th Field Artillery Battalion in New Ulm. He returned in April from duty providing security at a U.S. base in Italy. He has too much respect for the office of president to heckle one. But he almost got busted for escorting those baby Democrats.

After riding a Bush bus to the quarry, Walz and the kids got off to go through the metal detectors and have their IDs checked. Bush officials took the kids aside and thoroughly inspected them. When one was discovered to have a Kerry sticker on his wallet, they were ordered back onto the bus.

Walz objected, and he was asked to leave, too. "You're not welcome," a Bush guy said. "Get back on the bus."

Walz said he had a right to see the president.

So you support the president? a Bush guy asked. I didn't say that, said Walz. Then you're an opponent? I didn't say that, either, said Walz, thinking it was nobody's business.

"If you don't get on that bus," the guy said, "you'll be detained by the Secret Service for interfering with a presidential event."

"I don't want to get arrested," Walz said. "My wife will get mad because I'm supposed to pick up our daughter [Hope, 3] and make dinner. Do you really want to arrest someone who just got back from overseas, because he wants to see the president?"

The Bush guys backed down. They said they'd do him a favor if he behaved himself. He ignored the insult. They said the Secret Service was watching him. They let him in.

A week later, Walz is appalled by the freedom-loving citizens who say he shouldn't have gone to see the president.

"The attitude is that if you're not a supporter, why would you go? It's really disappointing. What happened to being able to listen to the other side?"

Walz listened. And made up his mind. On Wednesday, he was named Blue Earth County manager of the Kerry campaign. In case you have forgotten how America works, that does not make him disloyal. And no one can say he is not informed.

Unlike many people, Tim Walz has gotten to see the president.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #3
There are indeed over zealous staffers on both campaigns. What is your point?
 
FredF said:
There are indeed over zealous staffers on both campaigns. What is your point?
[post="168367"][/post]​

What, you couldn't blame it on Clinton, Fred?

If we have to explain the point, Fred, you probably wouldn't get it anyway.

Do you think the 'overzealous staffers' that you allege Kerry has get to threaten people with the Secret Service?
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #6
Trying to split them hairs real fine arn't you.

You might want to read that one again there dude.

"In 1987, he voted for a provision (different from the "Screw Nevada" bill) that made the Yucca project almost inevitable."
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #7
NWA/AMT said:
Do you think the 'overzealous staffers' that you allege Kerry has get to threaten people with the Secret Service?
[post="168369"][/post]​

Actually, now that he has a Secret Service escort, yes they do get to.

Do I think it is right? Not in a million years.

Do you actually think that the President told some low level staffer to threaten people coming into here if they are not obvious supporters?

No wait don't answer that one. You still believe that there are no WMD in IRAQ, Iraq as not related at all to Al Queda and that the President Lied.


Nevermind. I forgot who I was addressing this to.
 
FredF said:
Trying to split them hairs real fine arn't you.

You might want to read that one again there dude.

"In 1987, he voted for a provision (different from the "Screw Nevada" bill) that made the Yucca project almost inevitable."
[post="168391"][/post]​

That is the OPINION of the writer of the OP/ED. Dude. Do you know when your reading an OP/ED and real news article?
 
FredF said:
Do you actually think that the President told some low level staffer to threaten people coming into here if they are not obvious supporters?
[post="168395"][/post]​

No, but just like his foreign policy he just made it clear he doesn't want any opinion in his presence that conflicts with his. What other world leaders have had that trait?

No wait don't answer that one.

How Republican of you. Awww..........C'mon Fred............let me answer that one. Unless you're going to send the Secret Service around if I do.

You still believe that there are no WMD in IRAQ, Iraq as not related at all to Al Queda and that the President Lied.

Wrong again, Fred. I know beyond a shadow of a doubt there were WMDs in Iraq in the 1980s and early 1990s. I also know that we have found no evidence that there were WMDs in Iraq in 2003, even after we changed our focus from finding WMDs to searching for evidence that there were even WMD programs in place. I know we kept the country under tight surveillance from 1991 to 2003 and never saw any being shipped out, so if they really existed they should still be there, right Fred?

I never said Iraq was not related to Al Qaeda, Fred, just that George's attempts to insinuate that Iraq was involved in 9/11 have been proven patently false and that he misled the American people into a war that has done nothing at all to bring our real enemies to justice.

Nevermind. I forgot who I was addressing this to.

Maybe it was Bill Clinton, Fred. After all, don't you believe it's all his fault?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top