runway4
Advanced
[blockquote]
----------------
On 10/16/2002 107 PM AAG2000 wrote:
Is that based on any concrete information, or is it purely conjecture? It's true that there is always plenty of demand for seats from JFK to SDQ, but aren't there additional costs associated with international service? I thought that was why Southwest has never expanded beyond the borders of the U.S., but I could be wrong. I would expect JetBlue to follow WN, and keep expanding domestically until all opportunities within the U.S. have been exhausted. As of now, B6 can do plenty of "connecting the dots" within its existing network--without even adding any new cities.
----------------
[/blockquote]
Hmm... interesting. Some of the non-flying job openings on their site require a passport. Not sure what there is to read into that.
I also think it makes sense for them to look into YYZ, YVR, YUL, etc. -- especially before the Tango's and JetsGo's (or whomever may be around after a few months) gain further inroads into the U.S.
----------------
On 10/16/2002 107 PM AAG2000 wrote:
Is that based on any concrete information, or is it purely conjecture? It's true that there is always plenty of demand for seats from JFK to SDQ, but aren't there additional costs associated with international service? I thought that was why Southwest has never expanded beyond the borders of the U.S., but I could be wrong. I would expect JetBlue to follow WN, and keep expanding domestically until all opportunities within the U.S. have been exhausted. As of now, B6 can do plenty of "connecting the dots" within its existing network--without even adding any new cities.
----------------
[/blockquote]
Hmm... interesting. Some of the non-flying job openings on their site require a passport. Not sure what there is to read into that.
I also think it makes sense for them to look into YYZ, YVR, YUL, etc. -- especially before the Tango's and JetsGo's (or whomever may be around after a few months) gain further inroads into the U.S.