tail_twister
Newbie
- Oct 10, 2007
- 4
- 0
You took 2+2 and got 5. The answer is not separation, the answer is integration.
The short term gain from selling an asset like AE will only go towards lining the pockets of Management while probably locking AA into a long term fee-for service agreement ala SABRE at above market rates.
Boomer, Take a look at the relationship between Continental and ExpressJet ala Continental Express. For years Continental pumped money into Express to feed their system. When things got tough, Continental spun Express off and started a fee for service arrangement. When they really examined the fleet demands hell Continental realized "hey we don't really have a need for 69 of these new Regional Jets so here ExpressJet we're not paying for them anymore you go do something with them". If you've taken notice to any of ExpressJets recent P/L statements you can see that they are hemorrhaging money. They lost almost 23 million this quarter while everybody else is making record profits. Continental is still getting their passengers at an industry rate without investing in a poorly run operation. American Eagle is no different than ExpressJet. It's poorly run, propped up by American Airlines and in need of a serious business management 101 lesson !! If AMR sold Eagle there would be a net positive effect for all. If Eagle started trying to jack the price up we'd just go to Republic and have them fly the routes. This business is operated by public demand for transportation and the fees they are willing to pay to get from point A to point B. The majors control the regionals, it's always been that way, it will never be any different. Why keep throwing money into an operation that can't tell the difference between their ass and their elbow. I say you can't sell it fast enough !! Put 'em out on their own and let them figure it out.