Well, he did not identify his source and the links in his unattributed copy, unlike those in the original, did not work.I was just rebutting your assertion that he was "hiding" links.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, he did not identify his source and the links in his unattributed copy, unlike those in the original, did not work.I was just rebutting your assertion that he was "hiding" links.
Well, he did not identify his source and the links in his unattributed copy, unlike those in the original, did not work.
Well, he did not identify his source and the links in his unattributed copy, unlike those in the original, did not work.
If you cannot argue against the overwhelming consensus in published peer review studies, simply assemble a list of the usual suspects, oops, skeptics. Than, add the name of anyone who has ever written anything critical of AGW, whether they have any economic conflict of interest or not. For a good measure, add a scattering of random so called experts, regardless of whether their fields have any relevance to climatology.Squirming around a bit when you can't discount some 400 eminent scientists bold assertion
If you cannot argue against the overwhelming consensus in published peer review studies, simply assemble a list of the usual suspects, oops, skeptics. Than, add the name of anyone who has ever written anything critical of AGW, whether they have any economic conflict of interest or not.